Maklan C W, Greene R, Cummings M A
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Center for Medical Effectiveness Research, Rockville, MD 20852.
Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7 Suppl):JS13-21.
Between 1989 and 1992, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) awarded funding to 14 special projects known as Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs). These large, complex projects form the centerpiece of the first generation of research under the Medical Treatment Effectiveness Program. In carrying out their individual 5-year research plans, and through collaborative work of six Inter-PORT Work Groups, PORTs have contributed to methodological advances related to their specific clinical focus and to outcomes research in general. Each of the PORTs has followed a standard research model, involving the application of: systematic literature review, measurement of outcomes, analysis of cost and claims data, decision analysis, and strategies for disseminating findings. This article reports what has been learned by individual PORTs, and by AHCPR, regarding the usefulness of each of these methodologies, both for the ongoing projects and for the next generation of effectiveness research. Example from individual PORTs and work groups illustrate some of the methodological gains that have been made in effectiveness research and provide a glimpse of the work that remains to be done.
1989年至1992年间,医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)向14个名为患者结果研究团队(PORTs)的特殊项目提供了资金。这些大型复杂项目构成了医疗治疗效果项目第一代研究的核心内容。在执行各自的5年研究计划过程中,PORTs通过6个跨PORTs工作组的协作,在与其特定临床重点相关的方法学进展以及总体结果研究方面都做出了贡献。每个PORTs都遵循一种标准研究模式,包括应用:系统文献综述、结果测量、成本和索赔数据分析、决策分析以及研究结果传播策略。本文报告了各个PORTs以及AHCPR就这些方法学中每一种方法的实用性所学到的内容,这些方法对于正在进行的项目以及下一代效果研究都很有用。来自各个PORTs和工作组的实例说明了效果研究中取得的一些方法学成果,并让我们初步了解了仍有待开展的工作。