Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
作者信息
Gavaghan H
出版信息
Nature. 1994 Jul 21;370(6486):170-1. doi: 10.1038/370170a0.
DOI:10.1038/370170a0
PMID:8028655
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
Nature. 1994 Jul 21;370(6486):170-1. doi: 10.1038/370170a0.
2
Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1169. doi: 10.1126/science.319.5867.1169.
3
NIH needs a makeover.美国国立卫生研究院需要进行改革。
Science. 2009 Aug 21;325(5943):944. doi: 10.1126/science.325_944b.
4
Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
Science. 2001 Nov 9;294(5545):1255-7. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5545.1255.
5
Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.生物医学研究。美国国立卫生研究院计划为创新人才提供新的资助。
Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):902. doi: 10.1126/science.301.5635.902a.
6
National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.美国国立卫生研究院。专家组权衡初始R01资助项目。
Science. 2004 Jun 25;304(5679):1891. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5679.1891a.
7
Looking to NSF as an NIH model.
Science. 2011 Aug 26;333(6046):1093. doi: 10.1126/science.333.6046.1093-a.
8
NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.美国国立卫生研究院：为21世纪做好准备。
Physiologist. 1997 Jun;40(3):89, 91-3.
9
National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
Science. 2009 Sep 25;325(5948):1607. doi: 10.1126/science.325_1607.
10
Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.研究经费。后翻倍时代的美国国立卫生研究院：现实与策略。
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1088-90. doi: 10.1126/science.1136931.
Zotero 插件