Park D L
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994;136:1-20. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2656-7_1.
Ciguatera toxins are odorless, tasteless, and generally undetectable by any simple chemical test; therefore, bioassays have traditionally been used to monitor suspect fish. Many native tests for toxicity in fish have been examined, including the discoloration of silver coins or copper wire or the repulsion of flies and ants, but all of these were rejected as invalid. Oral feeding of fish to cats or mongoose is a simple and relatively sensitive assay, but cats often regurgitate part of the meal. Feeding tests described above have been used in screening fish for toxicity, but they are cumbersome and nonquantitative. A mouse bioassay was developed; unfortunately, this procedure requires purification fish extracts, since mice are not very sensitive to ciguatoxin. An alternative to the use of mice is the mosquito bioassay, which was recently used to obtain a dose-response relationship between ingested ciguatoxin and clinical symptoms in man. This assay correlates reasonably well with cat and mouse bioassay. Many other bioassays have been developed using chicken, brine shrimp, and the guinea pig atrium. All traditional bioassays have one common disadvantage, the lack of specificity for individual toxins. Recent studies have also focused on the development of chemical methods, i.e., TLC and HPLC, for the detection and quantification of ciguatera-related toxins (okadaic acid and ciguatoxin and its analogs). Alternative assays based on immunochemical technology have been developed and show the greatest promise for use in seafood safety monitoring programs. For earlier methods (RIA and ELISA formats), liver extracts from ciguatoxic eels were used to prepare ciguatoxin antisera. The assay has been further adapted to a solid-phase immunobead assay (S-PIA), which has a very high potential for use as a marketplace screening tool to separate ciguateric fish. This assay can also be used to monitor reefs for ciguatera potential. Historically, attempts to validate methods used to measure ciguatera toxicity have been plagued with a lack of specificity and reference standards. These restrictions have been resolved, and a study is under way to evaluate the precision and accuracy of a low-cost, simplified field and laboratory S-PIA kit (Ciguatect, Hawaii Chemtect International, Pasadena, California, 91109), through an international interlaboratory trial using the AOAC/IUPAC validation mechanism.
雪卡毒素无味、无臭,一般无法通过任何简单的化学测试检测出来;因此,传统上一直使用生物测定法来监测可疑鱼类。人们已经对许多鱼类毒性的天然测试方法进行了研究,包括银币或铜线变色、驱赶苍蝇和蚂蚁等方法,但所有这些方法都因无效而被摒弃。将鱼喂给猫或獴是一种简单且相对灵敏的测定方法,但猫常常会将部分食物吐出。上述喂食测试已用于筛选鱼类的毒性,但它们操作繁琐且无法定量。人们开发了一种小鼠生物测定法;不幸的是,由于小鼠对雪卡毒素不太敏感,该方法需要对鱼提取物进行纯化。使用小鼠的替代方法是蚊子生物测定法,该方法最近被用于获取摄入的雪卡毒素与人类临床症状之间的剂量反应关系。该测定法与猫和小鼠生物测定法的相关性相当好。人们还开发了许多其他生物测定法,使用鸡、卤虫和豚鼠心房。所有传统生物测定法都有一个共同的缺点,即对个别毒素缺乏特异性。最近的研究还集中在化学方法的开发上,即薄层色谱法(TLC)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC),用于检测和定量雪卡毒素相关毒素(冈田酸、雪卡毒素及其类似物)。基于免疫化学技术的替代测定法已经开发出来,并在海产品安全监测计划中显示出最大的应用前景。对于早期方法(放射免疫分析和酶联免疫吸附测定形式),使用来自含雪卡毒素鳗鱼的肝脏提取物来制备雪卡毒素抗血清。该测定法已进一步改进为固相免疫珠测定法(S-PIA),作为一种用于区分含雪卡毒素鱼类的市场筛选工具具有很高的潜力。该测定法还可用于监测珊瑚礁的雪卡毒素潜在风险。从历史上看,用于验证雪卡毒素毒性测量方法的尝试一直因缺乏特异性和参考标准而受到困扰。这些限制已经得到解决,目前正在进行一项研究,通过使用美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)/国际纯粹与应用化学联合会(IUPAC)验证机制的国际实验室间试验,评估一种低成本、简化的现场和实验室S-PIA试剂盒(Ciguatect,夏威夷化学检测国际公司,加利福尼亚州帕萨迪纳,91109)的精密度和准确性。