Koelz H R
Medizinische Klinik, Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich.
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1994 Jun 21;83(25-26):768-71.
Gastrointestinal side effects are common to all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Relevant to the patient are NSAID-induced dyspepsia and ulcer complications such as hemorrhage and perforation. The most important prophylactic means is repeated verification that the NSAID cannot be replaced by other measures, e.g. physical therapy or simple analgesics. If a NSAID is needed, it should be administered at the lowest effective dose. The present drugs used in preventing NSAID-induced ulcers and their complications are far from perfect. Major problems are adverse effects, high costs and insufficient efficacy in the prevention of ulcer complications. Thus, prophylactic antiulcer treatment is recommended in high-risk patients (as a primary prophylaxis) and in patients with previous ulcers (as a secondary prophylaxis). Similar arguments apply for prevention of ulcers in intensive-care patients. Patients at risk are critically ill, those with previous ulcers and in particular those with clotting disorders. Acid-reducing drugs are recommended for nonintubated patients, whereas sucralfate is preferred in patients on artificial ventilation because it is associated with a lower risk for nosocomial pneumonias.
胃肠道副作用是所有非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)常见的不良反应。与患者相关的是NSAID引起的消化不良以及溃疡并发症,如出血和穿孔。最重要的预防措施是反复确认NSAID无法被其他措施替代,例如物理治疗或单纯的镇痛药。如果需要使用NSAID,应以最低有效剂量给药。目前用于预防NSAID引起的溃疡及其并发症的药物远非完美。主要问题是副作用、成本高以及预防溃疡并发症的疗效不足。因此,建议在高危患者(作为一级预防)和既往有溃疡的患者(作为二级预防)中进行预防性抗溃疡治疗。类似的观点也适用于重症监护患者的溃疡预防。高危患者包括重症患者、既往有溃疡的患者,尤其是有凝血障碍的患者。对于未插管患者,推荐使用抑酸药物,而对于接受人工通气的患者,硫糖铝更受青睐,因为它与医院获得性肺炎的风险较低相关。