Sarasin F P, Bounameaux H
Clinique Médicale 1, Hôpital Cantonal, University of Geneva Medical School, Switzerland.
Thromb Haemost. 1994 Mar;71(3):286-91.
The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower limbs remains controversial. To compare the risk-benefit tradeoffs for different treatment durations (6 to 24 weeks) we constructed a Markov-based decision analysis model which explicitly balances the time-dependent declining risk of recurrent thrombosis and pulmonary embolism against the risk of major hemorrhagic complications. Specifically, we determined the threshold below which the risk of recurrent DVT exceeds the risk of major hemorrhage if anticoagulant therapy is discontinued, and above which the benefits provided by oral anticoagulants are outweighed by their risk. Our model shows that for patients with a low hemorrhagic risk (0.5%/month), the benefit yielded by oral anticoagulants breaks off beyond the 4th month of therapy, while patients with moderate (1%/month) to high (2%/month) bleeding risk will no longer benefit from the therapy after 3 or 2.5 months, respectively. In conclusion, our model supports the validity of the usually recommended duration of 3 months of oral anticoagulation after proximal vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, but suggests that this duration should be modulated between 2.5 and 4 months depending upon individual bleeding risk. Since clinical trials can hardly handle the complexity of the addressed issue, such a model may prove very helpful in daily clinical practice.
下肢近端深静脉血栓形成(DVT)后口服抗凝治疗的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。为比较不同治疗持续时间(6至24周)的风险效益权衡,我们构建了一个基于马尔可夫的决策分析模型,该模型明确平衡了复发性血栓形成和肺栓塞随时间下降的风险与严重出血并发症的风险。具体而言,我们确定了一个阈值,如果停用抗凝治疗,低于该阈值复发性DVT的风险超过严重出血的风险,高于该阈值口服抗凝剂带来的益处将被其风险所抵消。我们的模型显示,对于出血风险较低(0.5%/月)的患者,口服抗凝剂在治疗4个月后产生的益处不再明显,而出血风险中等(1%/月)至较高(2%/月)的患者分别在3个月或2.5个月后将不再从治疗中获益。总之,我们的模型支持下肢近端静脉血栓形成后通常推荐的3个月口服抗凝持续时间的有效性,但建议该持续时间应根据个体出血风险在2.5至4个月之间进行调整。由于临床试验很难处理所涉及问题的复杂性,这样的模型在日常临床实践中可能会被证明非常有用。