• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射免疫球蛋白作为成人免疫性血小板减少症的初始治疗,与口服皮质类固醇相比并无优势:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

Intravenous gammaglobulin has no advantages over oral corticosteroids as primary therapy for adults with immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Jacobs P, Wood L, Novitzky N

机构信息

University of Cape Town Leukaemia Centre, Republic of South Africa.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1994 Jul;97(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90048-5.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90048-5
PMID:8030657
Abstract

Symptomatic immune thrombocytopenia in adults is potentially lethal, and, when conventionally treated with oral corticosteroid agents, approximately two thirds of patients will have some response in platelet count, but this is seldom durable. Since cytotoxic drugs are of limited benefit at this stage, splenectomy becomes necessary in 70% of patients. Intravenous gammaglobulin has been advocated as an alternative to prednisone as the primary form of treatment. A prospective, randomized comparison was carried out between oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day; group 1; n = 17), high-dose intravenous gammaglobulin (400 mg/kg on days 1 through 5; group 2; n = 13), or a combination of both agents given on the same schedule (group 3; n = 13). The groups were well matched clinically and hematologically. No mortality occurred after initiating therapy, but one patient experienced a cerebrovascular accident. Response, defined as a platelet count greater than 50 x 10(9)/L, was achieved in 82%, 54%, and 92% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, but was only significant between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.0365). The median times to peak platelet counts were 8.5 days (range 7 to 21 days), 7 (range 5 to 10 days), and 7 (range 3 to 23 days), respectively. Although there was a trend in favor of the steroid-administered groups, relapse was not significantly different, which occurred at a median of 184, 32, and 76 days, respectively, nor was the average time to splenectomy different at 339, 59, and 98 days, respectively. At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, 5 of 17 in group 1, 2 of 13 in group 2, and 1 of 13 in group 3 had achieved platelet counts of greater than 100 x 10(9)/L and, therefore, did not require splenectomy. In contrast, where this indication was present for failure to respond, 8 of 12 (67%) in group 1, 4 of 8 (50%) in group 2, and 9 of 12 (75%) in group 3 remain in complete remission. Significantly more patients in group 2 than group 3 experienced a relapse (P = 0.0365). It is concluded that in previously untreated adults with symptomatic immune thrombocytopenia, gammaglobulin offers no advantage over conventional corticosteroid administration as the primary form of therapy. Additionally, more intense immunosuppression, resulting from the use of both agents combined, is no better than single agent corticosteroid agents and appears to be an unnecessary and unwarranted expense.

摘要

成人症状性免疫性血小板减少症有潜在致命性,当采用口服皮质类固醇药物进行常规治疗时,约三分之二的患者血小板计数会有一定反应,但这种反应很少能持久。由于细胞毒性药物在此阶段益处有限,70%的患者需要进行脾切除术。静脉注射丙种球蛋白已被提倡作为泼尼松的替代疗法作为主要治疗形式。对口服泼尼松(1毫克/千克/天;第1组;n = 17)、大剂量静脉注射丙种球蛋白(第1至5天400毫克/千克;第2组;n = 13)或按相同方案联合使用两种药物(第3组;n = 13)进行了一项前瞻性随机比较。各组在临床和血液学方面匹配良好。开始治疗后无死亡病例,但有1例患者发生了脑血管意外。分别在第1组、第2组和第3组中,血小板计数大于50×10⁹/L的患者比例分别为82%、54%和92%,但仅在第2组和第3组之间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0365)。血小板计数达到峰值的中位时间分别为8.5天(范围7至21天)、7天(范围5至10天)和7天(范围3至23天)。尽管有支持使用类固醇治疗组的趋势,但复发情况无显著差异,复发的中位时间分别为184天、32天和76天,脾切除的平均时间分别为339天、59天和98天也无差异。在至少2年的随访中,第1组17例中有5例、第2组13例中有2例、第3组13例中有1例血小板计数大于100×10⁹/L,因此无需进行脾切除术。相比之下,在因治疗无效而有此指征的情况下,第1组12例中有8例(67%)、第2组8例中有4例(50%)、第3组12例中有9例(75%)仍处于完全缓解状态。第2组复发的患者明显多于第3组(P = 0.0365)。得出的结论是,在既往未治疗的有症状免疫性血小板减少症成人患者中,作为主要治疗形式,丙种球蛋白与传统皮质类固醇给药相比并无优势。此外,联合使用两种药物导致的更强免疫抑制并不比单一使用皮质类固醇药物更好,而且似乎是不必要和不合理的费用。

相似文献

1
Intravenous gammaglobulin has no advantages over oral corticosteroids as primary therapy for adults with immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective randomized clinical trial.静脉注射免疫球蛋白作为成人免疫性血小板减少症的初始治疗,与口服皮质类固醇相比并无优势:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Med. 1994 Jul;97(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90048-5.
2
The comparison of gammaglobulin to steroids in treating adult immune thrombocytopenia. An interim analysis.成人免疫性血小板减少症治疗中γ球蛋白与类固醇的比较。一项中期分析。
Blut. 1989 Jul;59(1):92-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00320256.
3
Results of treatment in immune thrombocytopenia.免疫性血小板减少症的治疗结果。
Q J Med. 1986 Feb;58(226):153-65.
4
A prospective, randomized trial of high-dose intravenous immune globulin G therapy, oral prednisone therapy, and no therapy in childhood acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura.一项关于大剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白G疗法、口服泼尼松疗法以及不进行治疗在儿童急性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜治疗中的前瞻性随机试验。
J Pediatr. 1993 Dec;123(6):989-95. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80400-7.
5
Intravenous gammaglobulin treatment for immune thrombocytopenia associated with infectious mononucleosis.静脉注射丙种球蛋白治疗传染性单核细胞增多症相关的免疫性血小板减少症。
Am J Hematol. 1991 Oct;38(2):124-9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830380210.
6
Omission of fetal sampling in treatment of subsequent pregnancies in fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.胎儿 - 新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症后续妊娠治疗中胎儿采样的省略
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):471.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
7
High-dose dexamethasone compared with prednisone for previously untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高剂量地塞米松与泼尼松用于既往未治疗的原发性免疫性血小板减少症的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Oct;3(10):e489-e496. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30109-0. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Randomised trial of intravenous immunoglobulin G, intravenous anti-D, and oral prednisone in childhood acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura.静脉注射免疫球蛋白G、静脉注射抗-D及口服泼尼松治疗儿童急性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的随机试验
Lancet. 1994 Sep 10;344(8924):703-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92205-5.
9
Antepartum treatment without early cordocentesis for standard-risk alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a randomized controlled trial.标准风险同种免疫性血小板减少症的产前治疗:一项不进行早期脐血穿刺的随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):249-55. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000270302.80336.dd.
10
Pretreatment with standard-dose intravenous methylprednisolone does not improve outcomes in newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).标准剂量静脉注射甲基强的松龙预处理不能改善新诊断的免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的结局。
Eur J Haematol. 2018 May;100(5):412-418. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13032. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of immune thrombocytopenia: 2022 update of Korean experts recommendations.免疫性血小板减少症的管理:2022年韩国专家建议更新版
Blood Res. 2022 Mar 31;57(1):20-28. doi: 10.5045/br.2022.2022043.
2
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Novel Insights into Pathophysiology and Disease Management.原发性免疫性血小板减少症:病理生理学与疾病管理的新见解
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):789. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040789.
3
American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia.美国血液学会 2019 年免疫性血小板减少症治疗指南。
Blood Adv. 2019 Dec 10;3(23):3829-3866. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000966.
4
Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis.新诊断的免疫性血小板减少症的一线治疗方法比较——系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):163-171. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.174615. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Cost effectiveness of romiplostim for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia in Ireland.罗米司亭治疗爱尔兰慢性免疫性血小板减少症的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):457-69. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0044-y.
6
Eltrombopag: the emerging evidence of its therapeutic value in thrombocytopenia.艾曲泊帕:其在血小板减少症中治疗价值的新证据
Core Evid. 2006;1(4):221-31. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
7
Possible association of a reduction in cardiovascular events with blood donation.献血与心血管事件减少之间可能存在的关联。
Heart. 1997 Aug;78(2):188-93. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.2.188.