Kohrmann K U, Henkel T O, Manning M, Mohr G, Rassweiler J, Junemann K P, Alken P
Department of Urology, Mannheim School of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Allemagne.
Ann Urol (Paris). 1994;28(3):121-7.
The treatment of ureteric calculi by extra-corporeal shock waves was found to have an 80% success rate by Mannheim authors, regardless of the site of the calculus. The authors compared two 3rd generation apparatuses: 1--the Siemens Lithostar Plus, in which waves are produced by a electromagnetic cylinder and focussed by a parabolic electromagnetic cylinder and focussed by a parabolic reflector: 2--the Storz Medical Modulith SL 10, in which waves produced by an electromagnetic coil are focussed by acoustic lenses. Both apparatuses are based upon image-intensification and ultrasonography concepts. No difference in efficacy was found between the two apparatuses. A second shock wave session was necessary in 16% of cases and some other type of additional treatment in 7% of cases.
曼海姆的作者发现,无论结石位于何处,体外冲击波治疗输尿管结石的成功率为80%。作者比较了两种第三代设备:1——西门子Lithostar Plus,其冲击波由电磁筒产生,经抛物面电磁筒聚焦,再由抛物面反射器聚焦;2——斯托兹医疗Modulith SL 10,其冲击波由电磁线圈产生,经声透镜聚焦。两种设备均基于影像增强和超声检查概念。结果发现两种设备在疗效上并无差异。16%的病例需要进行第二次冲击波治疗,7%的病例需要进行其他某种类型的额外治疗。