Stephenson P S
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Oct 18;113(8):764, 767-9.
There is much controversy in the literature concerning prevalence, cause, diagnosis and treatment of hyperkinesis. The subject is complex; there is much ambiguity, and many research studies and reports of successful treatment appear to be overly simplistic in their approach to the problem. The use of the term "hyperkinesis" as synonymous with "hyperactivity" and often also with "minimal cerebral dysfunction" causes much confusion. There appear to be some common underlying beliefs about hyperkinetic children; these are critically examined. From integration of reports in the literature with clinical experience, it is contended that the term hyperkinesis should be restricted to the definition used in the British studies, and hyperactivity should be considered only a symptom. Hyperactivity has a large number of underlying causes, and management plans need to be individualized.
关于多动症的患病率、病因、诊断和治疗,文献中存在诸多争议。该主题很复杂;存在很多模糊之处,而且许多关于成功治疗的研究报告在处理这个问题的方法上似乎过于简单化。将“多动症”一词用作“多动”的同义词,并且常常也与“轻微脑功能障碍”同义,这造成了很多混淆。对于多动症儿童似乎存在一些共同的潜在看法;对这些看法进行了批判性审视。通过将文献报告与临床经验相结合,有人认为多动症一词应仅限于英国研究中所使用的定义,而多动仅应被视为一种症状。多动有大量潜在病因,管理计划需要个体化。