• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北欧医疗体系中的患者选择与患者赋权:一个概念框架

Patient choice and patient empowerment in northern European health systems: a conceptual framework.

作者信息

Saltman R B

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, Emory University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA 30329.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(2):201-29. doi: 10.2190/8WMP-RR2K-ABM7-NVNH.

DOI:10.2190/8WMP-RR2K-ABM7-NVNH
PMID:8034390
Abstract

The issue of patient choice presents a complicated challenge to publicly operated health systems. Increased patient choice can strengthen the citizen's commitment to traditional welfare state objectives, or alternatively, it can severely damage that commitment, depending upon the design of the choice mechanism and the structural context within which patient choice occurs. For patient choice to be linked to true empowerment, choice must reinforce rather than undercut the accountability of health care providers to the population they serve. This article explores the basic issues involved in empowering patients within publicly operated health systems. The author first reviews the conceptual components that could or should be incorporated within the notion of empowered patients, then examines what would be required to actually empower patients within health systems, defined in terms of expanding not only logistical choice but also clinical influence and decision-making participation. The article concludes with a wide-ranging analysis of the impact of potential policies and mechanisms on the long-term objectives in achieving democratically accountable health care systems.

摘要

患者选择问题给公立医疗系统带来了复杂的挑战。患者选择的增加既能强化公民对传统福利国家目标的承诺,也可能严重损害这种承诺,这取决于选择机制的设计以及患者选择发生的结构背景。要使患者选择与真正的赋权相联系,选择必须加强而非削弱医疗服务提供者对其服务人群的问责制。本文探讨了在公立医疗系统中赋予患者权力所涉及的基本问题。作者首先回顾了可能或应该纳入赋权患者概念的组成部分,然后研究了在医疗系统中真正赋予患者权力需要什么,这不仅包括扩大后勤选择,还包括临床影响力和决策参与度。文章最后对潜在政策和机制对实现民主问责医疗系统长期目标的影响进行了广泛分析。

相似文献

1
Patient choice and patient empowerment in northern European health systems: a conceptual framework.北欧医疗体系中的患者选择与患者赋权:一个概念框架
Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(2):201-29. doi: 10.2190/8WMP-RR2K-ABM7-NVNH.
2
Choice policies in Northern European health systems.北欧医疗体系中的选择政策。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2012 Jan;7(1):47-71. doi: 10.1017/S1744133111000302.
3
Shared decision making in Brazil: history and current discussion.巴西的共同决策:历史与当前讨论
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
4
Why can't we do what they do? National health reform abroad.为什么我们不能做他们所做的事情?国外的全民医疗改革。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Fall;32(3):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00154.x.
5
Evaluating mental health care and policy in Spain.评估西班牙的精神卫生保健与政策。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):73-86.
6
[Empowerment in prevention and health promotion--a critical conceptual evaluation of basic understanding, dimensions and assessment problems].[预防与健康促进中的赋权——对基本理解、维度及评估问题的批判性概念评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):715-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102956. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
7
Shared decision making development in Switzerland: room for improvement!瑞士共同决策制定的发展:仍有改进空间!
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):296-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
8
Shared decision making in the Netherlands, is the time ripe for nationwide, structural implementation?荷兰的共同决策,在全国范围内进行结构性实施的时机是否已经成熟?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
9
Empowerment in nursing: paternalism or maternalism?护理中的赋权:家长式作风还是母性作风?
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(13):695-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.13.21478.
10
Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: contradictions, crisis and change.美国的赋权与精神疾病消费者/康复者运动:矛盾、危机与变革
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(8):1053-71. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00179-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a Self-Guided Transdiagnostic Smartphone App on Patient Empowerment and Mental Health: Randomized Controlled Trial.一款自助式跨诊断智能手机应用程序对患者赋权及心理健康的影响:随机对照试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Nov 6;10:e45068. doi: 10.2196/45068.
2
Quality of DNA extracted from freshwater fish scales and mucus and its application in genetic diversity studies of and .从淡水鱼鳞片和黏液中提取的DNA质量及其在[具体鱼类1]和[具体鱼类2]遗传多样性研究中的应用
Biol Methods Protoc. 2023 Sep 28;8(1):bpad022. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpad022. eCollection 2023.
3
Ethnic inequities in the patterns of personalized care adjustments for 'informed dissent' and 'patient unsuitable': a retrospective study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
基于临床实践研究数据库的回顾性研究:调整“知情异议”和“患者不适合”的个性化护理模式中的种族不平等
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):e692-e701. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad104.
4
Does app-based unguided self-management improve mental health literacy, patient empowerment and access to care for people with mental health impairments? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基于应用程序的无指导自我管理是否能提高心理健康素养、增强患者权能并改善精神障碍患者的护理获取?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 15;11(7):e049688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049688.
5
Treating epistaxis - who cares for a bleeding nose? A secondary data analysis of primary and secondary care.治疗鼻出血 - 谁来关心流鼻血?初级和二级保健的二次数据分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 15;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01411-1.
6
The patient perspective: investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process.患者视角:探究肿瘤护理过程中患者赋权的促进因素和障碍。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Mar 28;13:912. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.912. eCollection 2019.
7
Patient acceptance of Self-Operated Endovaginal Telemonitoring (SOET): proof of concept.患者对自我操作式阴道内远程监测(SOET)的接受度:概念验证
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(3):161-70.
8
Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines.消费者参与临床实践指南制定中的主题和结局选择。
Health Expect. 2012 Dec;15(4):410-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00676.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
9
[Professional empowerment in Spanish medical primary care].[西班牙初级医疗保健中的专业赋权]
Aten Primaria. 2005 Jan;35(1):37-42. doi: 10.1157/13071031.
10
Editorial.
Health Expect. 1999 Sep;2(3):147-149. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00056.x.