• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Preliminary experience with a hybrid nonthoracotomy defibrillating system that includes a biphasic device: comparison with a standard monophasic device using the same lead system.

作者信息

Natale A, Sra J, Axtell K, Maglio C, Dhala A, Deshpande S, Jazayeri M, Wase A, Akhtar M

机构信息

Electrophysiology Laboratory, Milwaukee Heart Institute of Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Aug;24(2):406-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90295-x.

DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(94)90295-x
PMID:8034875
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the advantage of combining a biphasic device with a transvenous system and compared the results with those obtained with a standard monophasic device.

BACKGROUND

Available lead systems use monophasic pulses and may require lengthy intraoperative testing to achieve adequate defibrillation threshold in a conspicuous number of patients. The option of biphasic waveform may provide further benefits. However, clinical experience with a permanent implant is lacking.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients underwent testing and received a permanent implant using the Endotak lead system associated with a CPI monophasic device. The remaining 36 patients received a permanent implant with the Endotak lead system connected to a biphasic device. In both groups a subcutaneous patch was combined when needed to obtain acceptable defibrillation thresholds.

RESULTS

Biphasic pulses resulted in lower mean (+/- SD) defibrillation thresholds (monophasic 15 +/- 4.7 J vs. biphasic 12 +/- 5 J, p = 0.03) and a better implantation rate (100% biphasic vs. 89% monophasic, p = 0.07). Biphasic pulses allowed implantation with less ventricular fibrillation induction (7.4 +/- 3.2 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.8, p < 0.01) and a mean shorter procedure time (168 +/- 39 vs. 111 +/- 30 min, p < 0.01). With the biphasic waveform a greater proportion of patients met the implantation criteria with the lead system alone (83% vs. 45%, p < 0.01). When needed, the left prepectoral location of the patch electrode was always sufficient in left subscapular position was required in 15 patients in the monophasic group. Implantation of the biphasic device was associated with a shorter mean hospital stay (3.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.4 +/- 2.2 days, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of a biphasic device in a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator uniformly increases the efficacy of the system and the ease of implantation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Preliminary experience with a hybrid nonthoracotomy defibrillating system that includes a biphasic device: comparison with a standard monophasic device using the same lead system.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Aug;24(2):406-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90295-x.
2
Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.双相波形联合顺序脉冲除颤可提高非开胸导联系统的除颤效果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Feb;23(2):317-22. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90413-8.
3
Comparison of biphasic and monophasic pulses: does the advantage of biphasic shocks depend on the waveshape?双相脉冲与单相脉冲的比较:双相电击的优势是否取决于波形?
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jul;18(7):1354-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02596.x.
4
Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation.用于人类非开胸除颤的双相波形优化
Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2646-54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2646.
5
Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.在单一电流路径上对单相、双相和序贯脉冲除颤进行直接比较。
Can J Cardiol. 1996 Apr;12(4):407-11.
6
Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.电极系统对人体双相波形除颤疗效的影响。
Circulation. 1991 Aug;84(2):665-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.2.665.
7
[Cardioverter-defibrillator implantations without thoracotomy: clinical experience with various electrode configurations and defibrillation wave forms of an endocardial/subcutaneous defibrillator system].[无需开胸的心脏复律除颤器植入术:心内膜/皮下除颤器系统不同电极配置和除颤波形的临床经验]
Z Kardiol. 1993 Feb;82(2):99-107.
8
Clinical experience with a new cardioverter defibrillator capable of biphasic waveform pulse and enhanced data storage: results of a prospective multicenter study. European Ventak P2 Investigator Group.一种新型具备双相波形脉冲及增强数据存储功能的心脏复律除颤器的临床经验:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。欧洲Ventak P2研究组
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Jul;17(7):1243-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01491.x.
9
A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 1):70-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02478.x.
10
Effect of biphasic waveform pulse on endocardial defibrillation efficacy in humans.双相波形脉冲对人体心内膜除颤疗效的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Feb;17(2):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01373.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary vein defibrillator coil placement in patients with high defibrillation thresholds.高除颤阈值患者冠状动脉静脉除颤器线圈的放置
J Arrhythm. 2018 Dec 3;35(1):79-85. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12136. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.2015年心脏节律学会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心脏电生理和心脏起搏学会关于植入式心脏复律除颤器最佳程控与测试的专家共识声明
J Arrhythm. 2016 Feb;32(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
Optimal biphasic waveforms for internal defibrillation using a 60 muF capacitor.
使用60微法电容器进行体内除颤的最佳双相波形。
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2002 Winter;7(4):188-92.
4
Ventricular pacing thresholds following high-energy implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in integrated bipolar defibrillation systems.集成双极除颤系统中高能植入式心脏复律除颤器电击后的心室起搏阈值
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2009 Spring;14(1):3-5.
5
A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex.右心室流出道与右心室心尖部除颤阈值的随机对照比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;22(3):221-5. doi: 10.1007/s10840-008-9254-x. Epub 2008 May 10.
6
A comparison of pectoral and abdominal transvenous defibrillator implantation: analysis of costs and outcomes.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Dec;2(4):345-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1009756520054.