Binder J, Sayegh M H, Watschinger B, Hancock W W, Kupiec-Weglinski J W
Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Transplantation. 1994 Jul 15;58(1):80-6.
LBNF1 cardiac allografts are rejected within 36 hr in Lewis (LEW) rats sensitized with Brown Norway (BN) skin grafts (acute rejection = 7.5 days). We analyzed the effects of intrathymic versus intravenous alloantigen challenge upon graft survival in this well-defined accelerated rejection model. Intrathymic injection of LBNF1 spleen cells (2 x 10(7)) at the time of skin transplantation (day -7) abrogated < 36 hr rejection, and prolonged the survival of cardiac allografts to about 11 days. This striking effect did not require concomitant immunosuppression, and was donor specific, as the transfer of syngeneic (LEW) or third-party (Wistar-Furth) splenocytes was ineffective. X-irradiation of donor spleen cells before inoculation restored accelerated rejection, whereas thymectomy at day -6 or 0 (the day of heart transplant) significantly shortened graft survival. In contrast, although intravenous administration of the same number of donor cells into sensitized recipients prolonged cardiac allograft survival to about 9 days, the effect was x-irradiation resistant and was never influenced by thymectomy. Radioactive tracer studies have revealed distinct trafficking patterns for the transferred cells, with those given intrathymically retained mostly in the thymus, and sequestered into host spleen and lymph nodes. Instead, intravenously injected splenocytes did not accumulate in the thymus, but were eventually trapped in the liver. Moreover, intrathymic immunomodulation has switched off cellular, rather than humoral, events at the graft site, and markedly depressed cell proliferative responses in host lymphoid organs, as analyzed by immunohistology and mixed lymphocyte response (MLR)* assay, respectively. In contrast, intravenous therapy did not have any significant effect on early intragraft cellular infiltration, including considerable neutrophil infiltration, and did not affect lymph node cell proliferation in vitro. These data document the importance of the thymus as a potential target organ for modulation of alloreactivity in vivo, and reinforce the role of distinct "central" and "peripheral" host immune mechanisms contributing to immunological unresponsiveness following organ transplantation.
在用棕色挪威(BN)皮肤移植致敏的刘易斯(LEW)大鼠中,LBNF1心脏同种异体移植物在36小时内被排斥(急性排斥反应 = 7.5天)。我们在这个明确的加速排斥模型中分析了胸腺内与静脉内同种异体抗原攻击对移植物存活的影响。在皮肤移植时(第-7天)胸腺内注射LBNF1脾细胞(2×10⁷)消除了<36小时的排斥反应,并将心脏同种异体移植物的存活期延长至约11天。这种显著效果不需要同时进行免疫抑制,并且是供体特异性的,因为同基因(LEW)或第三方(Wistar-Furth)脾细胞的转移是无效的。接种前对供体脾细胞进行X射线照射恢复了加速排斥反应,而在第-6天或0天(心脏移植日)进行胸腺切除术显著缩短了移植物存活期。相比之下,虽然将相同数量的供体细胞静脉内给予致敏受体可将心脏同种异体移植物存活期延长至约9天,但该效果对X射线照射具有抗性,并且从未受到胸腺切除术的影响。放射性示踪研究揭示了转移细胞的不同迁移模式,胸腺内给予的细胞大多保留在胸腺中,并隔离在宿主脾脏和淋巴结中。相反,静脉内注射的脾细胞不会在胸腺中积聚,但最终会被困在肝脏中。此外,如分别通过免疫组织学和混合淋巴细胞反应(MLR)*分析所显示的,胸腺内免疫调节关闭了移植物部位的细胞而非体液事件,并显著抑制了宿主淋巴器官中的细胞增殖反应。相比之下,静脉内治疗对早期移植物内细胞浸润没有任何显著影响,包括大量中性粒细胞浸润,并且不影响体外淋巴结细胞增殖。这些数据证明了胸腺作为体内同种异体反应性调节潜在靶器官的重要性,并强化了不同的“中枢”和“外周”宿主免疫机制在器官移植后导致免疫无反应性中的作用。