Milne E, Hutchinson A, Platt P, Parkin D
Northern Regional Health Authority, Newcastle upon Tyne.
J Public Health Med. 1994 Mar;16(1):41-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042934.
The development of case mix measures for National Health Service (NHS) care has become of great importance recently. Much effort has been put into devising measures for in-patient care, but measures for ambulatory (outpatient, day care and primary care) visits are less developed. Ambulatory Visit Groups (AVGs) is an American system devised to aggregate ambulatory visits into iso-resource groups. However, some assumptions made in the construction of the AVG system may not hold for the UK health service, including the use of consultation time as a proxy for the total resource use associated with the out-patient attendance. To test AVGs in the UK context, a three-month prospective study of rheumatology out-patient attendances at two hospitals in Newcastle upon Tyne assembled a database of 3393 'visits', together with resource use data. The AVGs derived from these were analysed to evaluate the homogeneity of the groups with respect to consultation resource use, and the degree to which consultation time can be considered a proxy for resource use in this setting. Consultation time distributions were markedly skewed, and required log transformation before analysis. Variation in log consultation time was found to depend as much on the clinician as on the AVG, and the two were observed to interact. Resource use distributions were also skewed, and were similarly transformed for analysis. Non-parametric analysis of variance showed resource use to be significantly associated with AVG, but the amount of variation associated with the AVG appeared to be small and inconsistent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
最近,为国民医疗服务体系(NHS)护理制定病例组合衡量标准变得极为重要。人们在设计住院护理衡量标准方面投入了大量精力,但针对门诊(门诊、日间护理和初级护理)就诊的衡量标准则发展较少。门诊就诊分组(AVGs)是美国设计的一种系统,旨在将门诊就诊聚合为等资源组。然而,AVG系统构建中所做的一些假设可能不适用于英国医疗服务体系,包括将会诊时间用作与门诊就诊相关的总资源使用的替代指标。为了在英国背景下测试AVGs,对泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔的两家医院的风湿病门诊就诊情况进行了为期三个月的前瞻性研究,收集了3393次“就诊”的数据库以及资源使用数据。对由此得出的AVGs进行分析,以评估各分组在会诊资源使用方面的同质性,以及在这种情况下会诊时间可被视为资源使用替代指标的程度。会诊时间分布明显呈偏态,在分析前需要进行对数转换。发现对数会诊时间的变化在很大程度上既取决于临床医生,也取决于AVG,并且观察到两者存在相互作用。资源使用分布也呈偏态,同样进行转换以进行分析。非参数方差分析表明资源使用与AVG显著相关,但与AVG相关的变化量似乎较小且不一致。(摘要截短为250字)