Mattioli A V, Vivoli D, Casali E
Cattedra di Cardiologia, Università degli Studi, Modena.
Cardiologia. 1994 Mar;39(3):203-7.
It was suggested that Doppler study of pulmonary venous flow (PVF) in combination with mitral flow is useful to evaluate ventricular function. In order to investigate the utility of PVF study in patients with total A-V block treated with pacemaker DDD, we performed transesophageal echocardiography pulsed Doppler of PVF and mitral flow in 12 patients. We measured the following parameters in PVF: peak systolic velocities (S1 and S2), peak diastolic velocity (D) reversal atrial flow diastolic deceleration time. In mitral flow we measured: E wave, A wave and deceleration time of E. We compared our results with the same patients with pacemaker inhibited. In patients with total A-V block with pacemaker inhibited we reported one systolic wave of PVF, a larger D wave with a shortened deceleration time. The PVA seems to disappear. Transmitral flow slowed a higher E wave in patients A-V block with pacemaker inhibited. In patients with total A-V block stimulated by DDD pacemaker we restored the atrioventricular sequentialty; therefore electric stimulation determines the onset of S1 peak and the reduction of S2 peak and the systematic presence of the atrial-pulmonary regurgitant wave.
有人提出,将肺静脉血流(PVF)多普勒研究与二尖瓣血流相结合,有助于评估心室功能。为了研究PVF研究在接受DDD起搏器治疗的完全性房室传导阻滞患者中的实用性,我们对12例患者进行了经食管超声心动图PVF和二尖瓣血流的脉冲多普勒检查。我们在PVF中测量了以下参数:收缩期峰值速度(S1和S2)、舒张期峰值速度(D)、心房逆向血流舒张期减速时间。在二尖瓣血流中,我们测量了:E波、A波和E波的减速时间。我们将我们的结果与相同患者起搏器抑制时的结果进行了比较。在起搏器抑制的完全性房室传导阻滞患者中,我们观察到PVF有一个收缩期波,D波较大且减速时间缩短。PVA似乎消失。在起搏器抑制的房室传导阻滞患者中,二尖瓣血流减慢,E波较高。在由DDD起搏器刺激的完全性房室传导阻滞患者中,我们恢复了房室顺序;因此,电刺激决定了S1峰值的开始、S2峰值的降低以及心房-肺反流波的系统性存在。