Chen H Y, Livermore D M
Department of Medical Microbiology, London Hospital Medical College, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Mar;33(3):453-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.3.453.
The effects of enterobacterial beta-lactamases were studied for biapenem (L627), a new carbapenem. Susceptibility tests were performed for isogenic mutant series of Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella morganii, Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris which varied only in chromosomal beta-lactamase expression. beta-Lactamase-derepressed organisms in these series were as susceptible as beta-lactamase-inducible strains to biapenem; beta-lactamase-basal mutants were up to eight-fold more susceptible. Similar patterns of relative activity against the different expression types were noted for imipenem and biapenem. These data were related to direct induction and hydrolysis assays: biapenem, like imipenem, was a strong inducer of several Class I enzymes and of the P. vulgaris cefuroximase and, like the other carbapenems, was only very slowly hydrolysed by these enzymes. Moreover, like meropenem, biapenem reversibly deactivated these beta-lactamases. Piperacillin and the cephalosporins, tested as comparators, were more labile than carbapenems to the Class I enzymes, were weak inducers below their MICs and lacked deactivator function. In consequence their MICs were higher for derepressed organisms than for those with inducible or basal beta-lactamase expression. Unlike the carbapenems, they selected derepressed mutants from inducible populations. Biapenem, like imipenem and meropenem, retained full activity against most transconjugants of Escherichia coli K-12 that produced plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, including extended-spectrum TEM mutants. Only production of OXA-10 (previously PSE-2) enzyme gave a slight reduction in susceptibility to the new carbapenem. Biapenem resistance (MIC 16 mg/L) did, however, occur in S. marcescens S6, which produced a chromosomal carbapenemase. This enzyme hydrolysed biapenem. Overall, our findings indicate that biapenem shares the favourable properties of imipenem and meropenem in its interactions with the most important beta-lactamases of enterobacteria.
对新型碳青霉烯类药物比阿培南(L627)的肠杆菌β-内酰胺酶作用进行了研究。对弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、阴沟肠杆菌、摩根摩根菌、黏质沙雷菌和普通变形杆菌的同基因突变株系列进行了药敏试验,这些菌株仅在染色体β-内酰胺酶表达上有所不同。这些系列中β-内酰胺酶去阻遏的菌株对比阿培南的敏感性与β-内酰胺酶可诱导菌株相同;β-内酰胺酶基础突变株的敏感性高8倍。亚胺培南和比阿培南对不同表达类型的相对活性也呈现类似模式。这些数据与直接诱导和水解试验相关:比阿培南与亚胺培南一样,是几种I类酶以及普通变形杆菌头孢呋辛酶的强诱导剂,并且与其他碳青霉烯类药物一样,仅被这些酶非常缓慢地水解。此外,与美罗培南一样,比阿培南可使这些β-内酰胺酶可逆失活。作为对照进行测试的哌拉西林和头孢菌素类药物比碳青霉烯类药物对I类酶更不稳定,在低于其最低抑菌浓度时是弱诱导剂且缺乏失活功能。因此,它们对去阻遏菌株的最低抑菌浓度高于对具有可诱导或基础β-内酰胺酶表达的菌株。与碳青霉烯类药物不同,它们从可诱导群体中筛选出去阻遏突变株。比阿培南与亚胺培南和美罗培南一样,对大多数产生质粒介导β-内酰胺酶的大肠杆菌K-12转接合子保持完全活性,包括超广谱TEM突变株。只有产生OXA-10(以前的PSE-2)酶会使对这种新型碳青霉烯类药物的敏感性略有降低。然而,产染色体碳青霉烯酶的黏质沙雷菌S6中确实出现了比阿培南耐药(最低抑菌浓度为16 mg/L)。这种酶可水解比阿培南。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,比阿培南在与肠杆菌最重要的β-内酰胺酶相互作用方面具有亚胺培南和美罗培南的良好特性。