• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ?

作者信息

Jiménez Glez J E, Rodrigo López M

机构信息

Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife (Islas Canarias), España.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1994 Mar;27(3):155-63. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700304.

DOI:10.1177/002221949402700304
PMID:8040633
Abstract

This study was designed to demonstrate whether the differences in reading between students with learning disabilities (LD) and non-learning disabled students (NLD) can be explained by IQ. A sample of 133 Spanish children (85 male, 48 female) ranging in age from 8 to 13 years were classified into four groups according to IQ as measured by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (< 80; 81-90; 91-109: 110-140) and into two groups based on reading level (LD and NLD). A lexical decision task was used and we manipulated different word parameters (length, positional syllabic frequency, and familiarity) and pseudoword parameters (length and positional syllabic frequency) to study the routes used by both groups. Our findings indicate that IQ does not explain the differences between children with LD and NLD children in lexical processing. We found that the lexical and sublexical parameters have a greater influence on students with LD than NLD students, independent of IQ. In synthesis, the LD group has more difficulty in lexical processing, which is influenced by poor phonological skills.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ?
J Learn Disabil. 1994 Mar;27(3):155-63. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700304.
2
The relationship between IQ and reading disabilities in English-speaking Canadian and Spanish children.
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;36(1):15-23. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360010301.
3
Cognitive correlates of mathematical achievement in children with cerebral palsy and typically developing children.脑性瘫痪儿童与正常发育儿童数学成就的认知相关性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Mar;82(Pt 1):120-35. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02034.x. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
4
The irrelevance of IQ to the definition of learning disabilities: some empirical evidence.智商与学习障碍定义的不相关性:一些实证证据。
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Aug-Sep;24(7):434-8. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400709.
5
An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia.阅读障碍差异定义的评估。
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Dec;25(10):618-29. doi: 10.1177/002221949202501001.
6
The relationship between phonological codes on memory and spelling tasks for students with and without learning disabilities.有学习障碍和无学习障碍学生的语音编码与记忆及拼写任务之间的关系。
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Jun-Jul;25(6):396-407. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500608.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: an alternative to the discrepancy model of LD.基于阅读成分模型的阅读障碍诊断与治疗:学习障碍差异模型的替代方案
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):67-84. doi: 10.1177/0022219407310838.
8
Persistence of phonological processing deficits in college students with dyslexia who have age-appropriate reading skills.阅读能力与年龄相符的诵读困难大学生语音加工缺陷的持续性。
J Learn Disabil. 2001 Sep-Oct;34(5):394-400. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400501.
9
[Does intelligence make a difference? Spelling and phonological readiness in specific and nonspecific reading/spelling disabilities].[智力有影响吗?特定和非特定阅读/拼写障碍中的拼写和语音准备情况]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2001 Feb;29(1):37-49. doi: 10.1024//1422-4917.29.1.37.
10
IQ of four-year-olds who go on to develop dyslexia.日后患诵读困难症的四岁儿童的智商。
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Sep-Oct;47(5):475-84. doi: 10.1177/0022219413479673. Epub 2013 Mar 14.