Aaron P G, Joshi R Malatesha, Gooden Regina, Bentum Kwesi E
Department of Educational Psychology, Indiana State University, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):67-84. doi: 10.1177/0022219407310838.
Currently, learning disabilities (LD) are diagnosed on the basis of the discrepancy between students' IQ and reading achievement scores. Students diagnosed with LD often receive remedial instruction in resource rooms. The available evidence suggests that the educational policy based on this discrepancy model has not yielded satisfactory results. This has led researchers to try other paradigms, such as the component model and response to intervention, for dealing with children with reading disabilities. The component model of reading (CMR) described in the present article identifies the reading component that is the source of reading difficulty and targets instruction at that component. Study 1 describes the CMR and reports on its validity. Study 2 describes the successful outcome of a 7-year CMR-based reading instruction program. Compared to the discrepancy model, the CMR has demonstrated several advantages.
目前,学习障碍(LD)是根据学生的智商和阅读成绩之间的差异来诊断的。被诊断为学习障碍的学生通常在资源教室接受补习。现有证据表明,基于这种差异模型的教育政策并未产生令人满意的结果。这促使研究人员尝试其他范式,如成分模型和回应干预,以应对阅读障碍儿童。本文所描述的阅读成分模型(CMR)确定了作为阅读困难根源的阅读成分,并针对该成分进行教学。研究1描述了CMR并报告了其有效性。研究2描述了一个基于CMR的为期7年的阅读教学计划的成功成果。与差异模型相比,CMR已显示出若干优势。