Suppr超能文献

作为阅读小组活动的课程讨论:两种干预措施的有效性

Lesson talk as the work of reading groups: the effectiveness of two interventions.

作者信息

Englert C S, Tarrant K L, Mariage T V, Oxer T

机构信息

College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1034.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1994 Mar;27(3):165-85. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700305.

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of two interventions that differed in the nature of dialogic interactions among teachers and students in the reading group. One hundred nine children with mild disabilities were instructed by 35 teacher-interns in special education resource rooms. Sixty-three and 46 students, respectively, participated in the two instruction interventions. The analyses indicated that the intervention that produced the greatest effects was the one in which dialogue, social interactions, and scaffolded instruction figured prominently. Limitations and implications of the study are discussed.

摘要

本研究比较了两种干预措施的效果,这两种干预措施在阅读小组中师生对话互动的性质上有所不同。109名轻度残疾儿童由35名特殊教育资源室的实习教师授课。分别有63名和46名学生参与了这两种教学干预。分析表明,产生最大效果的干预措施是对话、社交互动和支架式教学显著的那种。讨论了该研究的局限性和意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验