Englert C S, Tarrant K L, Mariage T V, Oxer T
College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1034.
J Learn Disabil. 1994 Mar;27(3):165-85. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700305.
This study compares the effectiveness of two interventions that differed in the nature of dialogic interactions among teachers and students in the reading group. One hundred nine children with mild disabilities were instructed by 35 teacher-interns in special education resource rooms. Sixty-three and 46 students, respectively, participated in the two instruction interventions. The analyses indicated that the intervention that produced the greatest effects was the one in which dialogue, social interactions, and scaffolded instruction figured prominently. Limitations and implications of the study are discussed.
本研究比较了两种干预措施的效果,这两种干预措施在阅读小组中师生对话互动的性质上有所不同。109名轻度残疾儿童由35名特殊教育资源室的实习教师授课。分别有63名和46名学生参与了这两种教学干预。分析表明,产生最大效果的干预措施是对话、社交互动和支架式教学显著的那种。讨论了该研究的局限性和意义。