Kumar L
Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Aug;12(8):1710-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.8.1710.
To review the current state of knowledge regarding the management of leukemic relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT).
The literature was analyzed using MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) and reports were identified through review of report bibliographies. Pertinent studies were selected and data synthesized into a review format.
Leukemic relapse after allogeneic BMT is an important cause of treatment failure. The risk of leukemic relapse varies from 20% to 60% depending on the diagnosis and phase of disease. Reinduction chemotherapy (CT), second BMT, interferon (IFN) alfa, and donor leukocyte infusions are various options, but none of the approaches is clearly optimal. Approximately 50% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients achieve remission after standard induction CT. However, most patients finally relapse and die of uncontrolled leukemia. Second BMT is successful in 20% to 25% patients and is a reasonable option in patients who relapse more than 6 months after the initial transplant. Young patients with a good performance status and those in remission from initial transplant relapse have a better outcome after second BMT. Venocclusive disease (VOD), interstitial pneumonitis (IP), and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are the main complications. Therapy with IFN alfa results in cytogenetic complete remission (CR) in 10% to 25% patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The initial results of leukocyte infusions from the original donor are promising. However, acute GVHD and bone marrow aplasia are associated complications. The correct dose and schedule of donor leukocyte infusions need to be determined in future studies to minimize GVHD while maintaining the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect.
Identification of patients at increased risk for relapse and use of biologic response modifiers post-transplant to augment the GVL effect in such patients are possible areas of improvement for future studies.
回顾关于异基因骨髓移植(BMT)后白血病复发管理的当前知识状态。
使用MEDLINE(美国国立医学图书馆,马里兰州贝塞斯达)分析文献,并通过查阅报告参考文献来识别报告。选择相关研究并将数据综合成综述形式。
异基因BMT后白血病复发是治疗失败的重要原因。白血病复发风险因疾病诊断和阶段而异,从20%到60%不等。再诱导化疗(CT)、第二次BMT、α干扰素(IFN)和供体白细胞输注是多种选择,但没有一种方法明显是最佳的。大约50%的急性髓性白血病(AML)和急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者在标准诱导CT后达到缓解。然而,大多数患者最终复发并死于无法控制的白血病。第二次BMT在20%至25%的患者中成功,对于初次移植后6个月以上复发的患者是一个合理的选择。年轻、身体状况良好且初次移植复发后缓解的患者在第二次BMT后预后较好。静脉闭塞性疾病(VOD)、间质性肺炎(IP)和急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)是主要并发症。α干扰素治疗使10%至25%的慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者获得细胞遗传学完全缓解(CR)。来自原始供体的白细胞输注的初步结果很有前景。然而,急性GVHD和骨髓再生障碍是相关并发症。未来研究需要确定供体白细胞输注的正确剂量和方案,以在维持移植物抗白血病(GVL)效应的同时将GVHD降至最低。
识别复发风险增加的患者并在移植后使用生物反应调节剂增强此类患者的GVL效应可能是未来研究的改进方向。