• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.

作者信息

Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):168-73.

PMID:8041524
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate three common instruments for sampling the endocervical canal: the Q-tip applicator, the Cytobrush, and the Cervex brush.

METHODS

Clinical, cytologic, and histologic data were collected from patients enrolled in the colposcopy clinic at the National Naval Medical Center. Subjects were assigned to one of three techniques: a combination of spatula and swab, a combination of spatula and Cytobrush, and the Cervex brush alone.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the ease of use or the amount of patient discomfort among the three methods, although the Cytobrush caused an increase in mild cervical bleeding. The Cytobrush yielded the greatest number of endocervical cells. The swab produced the lowest number of endocervical cells and the greatest cellular distortion. The ability to identify patients with biopsy-proven dysplasia was comparable for each of the three methods.

CONCLUSION

The Cytobrush was the best device for sampling the endocervical canal, but it was no more sensitive in detecting cervical dysplasia.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):168-73.
2
Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.孕妇宫颈细胞刷和宫颈刷的评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43.
3
A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):241-5.
4
Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.孕期宫颈巴氏涂片检查中细胞刷与棉拭子的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1993 Feb;38(2):147-50.
5
A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.三种获取巴氏涂片方法的随机试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):831-6.
6
Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.比较Cytobrush加塑料刮片与宫颈刷获取宫颈管细胞的情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):569-72.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.刮匙-细胞刷涂片检查宫颈鳞状病变的诊断准确性
Acta Cytol. 1988 Nov-Dec;32(6):801-4.
8
Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.子宫颈刷和细胞刷。它们用于宫颈涂片采集异常细胞能力的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1991 Aug;36(8):581-6.
9
The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
J Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;45(2):159-63.
10
Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.宫颈采样的刮板法与非刮板法比较。
Acta Cytol. 1991 Jan-Feb;35(1):69-75.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Cervex-Brush® Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology.用于液基细胞学宫颈取样的Cervex-Brush®组合刷与Cytobrush+Ayres刮勺组合的比较
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164077. eCollection 2016.
2
Collection of the BD SurePath Pap Test with a broom device plus endocervical brush improves disease detection when compared to the broom device alone or the spatula plus endocervical brush combination.与单独使用扫帚装置或刮板加宫颈管刷组合相比,使用扫帚装置加宫颈管刷收集BD SurePath巴氏试验可提高疾病检测率。
Cytojournal. 2008 Feb 12;6:4. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.45495.
3
Additional collection devices used in conjunction with the SurePath Liquid-Based Pap Test broom device do not enhance diagnostic utility.
与SurePath液基巴氏涂片测试扫帚装置联合使用的其他采集装置不会提高诊断效用。
BMC Womens Health. 2004 Sep 13;4(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-4-6.