Suppr超能文献

评估用于评估初次巴氏涂片异常的方法。

Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.

作者信息

Higgins R V, Hall J B, McGee J A, Laurent S, Alvarez R D, Partridge E E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):174-8.

PMID:8041525
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of the different modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.

METHODS

The study population comprised 214 nonpregnant women referred with a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Each patient was evaluated by a repeat Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed cervical biopsies. Immediate loop excision was performed to remove the entire transformation zone in all patients. Kappa statistics were calculated to determine agreement among the modalities, and logistic regression was used for determining relative risks (RR).

RESULTS

There was 53% agreement between the initial and repeat Papanicolaou smears. When low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was diagnosed by Papanicolaou smear, there was 89% agreement with the colposcopic impression. However, a colposcopic impression of high-grade SIL was found in only one-third of the women diagnosed with high-grade SIL by Papanicolaou smear. A comparison of the histology of the cervical biopsy and the loop specimen revealed 57% agreement. Univariate analysis indicated that each modality was able to predict the RR of high-grade dysplasia in the loop specimen at a statistical significance level of .05. A colposcopic impression of high-grade dysplasia conferred an RR of 7.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-25.49) for high-grade dysplasia in the loop specimen. An initial Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of high-grade SIL did not contribute to the multivariate model for calculating the risk of high-grade dysplasia, as the RR was 1.6 (95% CI 0.68-3.81).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an initial Papanicolaou smear showing low-grade SIL would benefit from a repeat Papanicolaou smear and colposcopically directed biopsies before proceeding with loop diathermy. In contrast, patients with a colposcopic impression of high-grade dysplasia combined with high-grade SIL on Papanicolaou smear appear to be candidates for immediate loop excision.

摘要

目的

探讨用于评估初次巴氏涂片异常的不同方法的疗效。

方法

研究人群包括214例因巴氏涂片诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变而转诊的非妊娠女性。每位患者均接受重复巴氏涂片、阴道镜检查及阴道镜引导下宫颈活检评估。所有患者均立即行环形切除术以切除整个转化区。计算Kappa统计量以确定各方法之间的一致性,并采用逻辑回归确定相对风险(RR)。

结果

初次和重复巴氏涂片之间的一致性为53%。当巴氏涂片诊断为低度鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)时,与阴道镜印象的一致性为89%。然而,在巴氏涂片诊断为高度SIL的女性中,仅三分之一的患者阴道镜印象为高度SIL。宫颈活检组织学与环形切除标本的比较显示一致性为57%。单因素分析表明,每种方法均能在统计学显著性水平为0.05时预测环形切除标本中高度发育异常的RR。阴道镜印象为高度发育异常使环形切除标本中高度发育异常的RR为7.43(95%置信区间[CI]2.17 - 25.49)。初次巴氏涂片诊断为高度SIL对计算高度发育异常风险的多变量模型无贡献,因为RR为1.6(95%CI 0.68 - 3.81)。

结论

初次巴氏涂片显示低度SIL的患者在进行环形透热疗法之前,重复巴氏涂片和阴道镜引导下活检可能有益。相反,阴道镜印象为高度发育异常且巴氏涂片为高度SIL的患者似乎适合立即行环形切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验