• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[丙泊酚持续灌注麻醉与硫喷妥钠-异氟烷麻醉用于喉部手术的比较研究]

[Comparative study between anesthesia by continuous perfusion with propofol or thiopental-isoflurane in laryngeal surgery].

作者信息

Sala X, Ayuso M A, Salvador L, Luis M, Nalda M A

机构信息

Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Barcelona.

出版信息

Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1994 Mar-Apr;41(2):93-6.

PMID:8041982
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare two anesthetic protocols for maintenance of anesthesia during laryngectomy (propofol vs thiopental-isoflurane), assessing its effects on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and recovery time after withdrawal of anesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Thirty-one patients undergoing laryngectomy. Anesthetic technique was the same except for the maintenance anesthetic used (isoflurane in group I [n = 16]; propofol in group P [n = 15]). We recorded heart rate and systolic/diastolic arterial pressure before surgery, 10 minutes after induction, at 10, 60 and 120 min after start of surgery and at the end of the procedure. Postanesthesia recovery time was measured by the Steward test (recovery of consciousness, control of voluntary movement and of breathing) applied at 3, 5, 10, 30 and 60 min after withdrawal of anesthesia.

RESULTS

There were no demographic differences between the two groups and heart rate and systolic/diastolic pressures were comparable. Postanesthetic recovery time was shorter in group P than in group I, with a statistically significant difference 5 min after withdrawal of drug (p < 0.05) owing to the item recovery of consciousness in the Steward test (p < 0.05 at times 5 and 10 min for this item). There were no significant differences in control of breathing or movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol for anesthetic maintenance is effective and safe. There are no differences in hemodynamic changes produced by propofol and isoflurane. Time until recovery of consciousness is longer with isoflurane, although we believe that this is not clinically relevant in this type of procedure.

摘要

目的

比较两种用于喉切除术麻醉维持的方案(丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠 - 异氟烷),评估其对术中血流动力学稳定性及麻醉停药后恢复时间的影响。

患者与方法

31例行喉切除术的患者。除所使用的维持麻醉药物不同外(I组[n = 16]使用异氟烷;P组[n = 15]使用丙泊酚),麻醉技术相同。我们记录了手术前、诱导后10分钟、手术开始后10、60和120分钟以及手术结束时的心率和收缩压/舒张压。通过在麻醉停药后3、5、10、30和60分钟应用Steward测试(意识恢复、自主运动控制和呼吸控制)来测量麻醉后恢复时间。

结果

两组在人口统计学方面无差异,心率及收缩压/舒张压具有可比性。P组的麻醉后恢复时间短于I组,在停药5分钟后差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),这是由于Steward测试中的意识恢复项目所致(该项目在5分钟和10分钟时p < 0.05)。在呼吸或运动控制方面无显著差异。

结论

丙泊酚用于麻醉维持有效且安全。丙泊酚和异氟烷产生的血流动力学变化无差异。异氟烷麻醉后意识恢复时间较长,尽管我们认为在这类手术中这在临床上并无相关性。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study between anesthesia by continuous perfusion with propofol or thiopental-isoflurane in laryngeal surgery].[丙泊酚持续灌注麻醉与硫喷妥钠-异氟烷麻醉用于喉部手术的比较研究]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1994 Mar-Apr;41(2):93-6.
2
[Does propofol have advantages over midazolam and isoflurane? Comparative study of 2 total intravenous anesthesia techniques using midazolam and propofol, versus balanced anesthesia with isoflurane].丙泊酚比咪达唑仑和异氟烷有优势吗?使用咪达唑仑和丙泊酚的两种全静脉麻醉技术与异氟烷平衡麻醉的比较研究
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1994 May-Jun;41(3):156-64.
3
[Intravenous anesthesia using propofol during lengthy neurosurgical interventions].[在长时间神经外科手术中使用丙泊酚进行静脉麻醉]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1995 May;42(5):163-8.
4
Propofol infusion for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in elderly patients: recovery and hemodynamic profiles.丙泊酚输注用于老年患者麻醉诱导和维持:恢复情况及血流动力学特征
J Clin Anesth. 1996 Jun;8(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00041-4.
5
Propofol-based anesthesia as compared with standard anesthetic techniques for middle ear surgery.与中耳手术标准麻醉技术相比的丙泊酚麻醉
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Feb;112(2):262-7. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989570248-2.
6
Total intravenous anesthesia with a continuous propofol-alfentanil infusion.采用丙泊酚-阿芬太尼持续输注进行全静脉麻醉。
CRNA. 1992 Aug;3(3):124-31.
7
Propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopental sodium-isoflurane-nitrous oxide for strabismus surgery in children.丙泊酚-氧化亚氮与硫喷妥钠-异氟烷-氧化亚氮用于儿童斜视手术的比较
J Clin Anesth. 1993 Jan-Feb;5(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90085-s.
8
[Endocrine stress reaction, hemodynamics and recovery in total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. Propofol versus isoflurane].[全凭静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉中的内分泌应激反应、血流动力学及恢复情况。丙泊酚与异氟烷的比较]
Anaesthesist. 1994 Nov;43(11):730-7. doi: 10.1007/s001010050115.
9
Use of propofol-isoflurane as an anesthetic regimen for cesarean section in dogs.使用丙泊酚-异氟醚作为犬剖宫产手术的麻醉方案。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Aug 1;211(3):313-7.
10
Changes in intraocular pressures during laparoscopy: a comparison of propofol total intravenous anesthesia to desflurane-thiopental anesthesia.腹腔镜检查期间眼内压的变化:丙泊酚全静脉麻醉与地氟醚-硫喷妥钠麻醉的比较
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Feb;22(1):47-52.