Suppr超能文献

做作性障碍的实验室诊断。

Laboratory diagnosis of factitious disorders.

作者信息

Wallach J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, State University of New York-Brooklyn Health Science Center.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 8;154(15):1690-6.

PMID:8042885
Abstract

Self-induced factitious disorders are defined and distinguished from conditions they may resemble. Review of the literature since 1965 indicates much more frequent reporting in recent years, but most health care providers are still not sufficiently aware of the common factitious disorder. Up to 5% of physician-patient encounters may be because of factitious disorders, but these are only suspected when the workup leads to contradictory findings. Laboratory tests are often the only definitive diagnostic method, and clinicians may not be familiar with current technologies. Some clinical clues are listed; heightened awareness and the need for early diagnosis are emphasized. Discordant laboratory results should raise the possibility of a factitious disorder. Sophisticated laboratory tests that can accurately assay very small amounts of specific hormones or foreign substances in body fluids facilitate the diagnosis. The primary physician can now confirm an initial clinical diagnosis of factitious disorder promptly and directly rather than only by exclusion.

摘要

自我诱导的做作性障碍被定义并与可能与之相似的病症区分开来。对1965年以来文献的回顾表明,近年来此类病症的报告更为频繁,但大多数医疗保健提供者对常见的做作性障碍仍认识不足。高达5%的医患接触可能是由做作性障碍引起的,但只有在检查结果相互矛盾时才会怀疑此病。实验室检查通常是唯一确定的诊断方法,而临床医生可能并不熟悉当前的技术。文中列出了一些临床线索;强调了提高认识和早期诊断的必要性。不一致的实验室结果应增加做作性障碍的可能性。能够准确检测体液中极少量特定激素或外来物质的精密实验室检查有助于诊断。现在,初级医生可以直接迅速地确认做作性障碍的初步临床诊断,而不仅仅是通过排除法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验