Eccles A, Marshall W L, Barbaree H E
Kingston Sexual Behaviour Clinic, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Behav Res Ther. 1994 Jun;32(5):539-46. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90143-0.
Some studies have suggested that phallometrically derived rape indices can differentiate groups of rapists and non-offenders. There are other studies however which cast doubt on this assertion, at least in so far as it applies to all but those few rapists who are sadistic. These studies have used rape indices which are derived from rapists' sexual responses to audiotaped descriptions of mutually consenting sex and brutal sexual assaults. It was hypothesized however, that stimuli which put more emphasis on the degrading and humiliating elements of rape would improve discriminability. Stimuli were compiled to test this hypothesis. The results indicate that neither rape indices derived from the physically brutal elements nor the degrading elements of rape were able to discriminate between rapists and non-offenders. Furthermore, these indices were not related to offence histories. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the assessment of rapists and theoretical considerations of their behaviour.
一些研究表明,通过阴茎测量得出的强奸指数可以区分强奸犯和非犯罪者群体。然而,也有其他研究对这一论断提出质疑,至少就适用于除少数施虐强奸犯之外的所有强奸犯而言是如此。这些研究使用的强奸指数源自强奸犯对双方自愿性行为和残忍性侵犯的录音描述的性反应。然而,有人提出假设,更强调强奸的侮辱性和羞辱性元素的刺激会提高辨别力。为此编制了刺激材料来检验这一假设。结果表明,无论是源自强奸身体暴力元素还是侮辱性元素的强奸指数,都无法区分强奸犯和非犯罪者。此外,这些指数与犯罪史无关。将根据这些结果对强奸犯评估的影响以及对其行为的理论思考进行讨论。