Suppr超能文献

对STAN系统和诺丁汉系统记录的胎儿心电图的比较研究。

A comparative study of the fetal electrocardiogram recorded by the STAN an Nottingham systems.

作者信息

Skillern L, Cockburn J, Benjamin M, Pearce J M, Sahota D, Reed N, Mohajer M, James D, Symonds M

机构信息

St. George's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jul;101(7):582-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13647.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the T:QRS ratio recorded by the STAN and Nottingham fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) monitors.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

London teaching hospital delivery suite and research unit.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

The T:QRS ratios generated by the STAN and Nottingham FECG monitors were simultaneously recorded and compared using signals generated from a computer-produced ECG signal and signals from 11 term fetuses recorded during labour.

RESULTS

There was an acceptable level of agreement between the two systems with the computer-generated signals, but it was not clinically acceptable with the signals from the fetuses recorded during labour. Disagreements in the T:QRS values were probably due to differences in the reference points for the measurement of the S-T segment and T-wave height.

CONCLUSION

The different points of reference for measurement of S-T segment and T-wave height can explain poor agreement between the two methods of FECG waveform analysis. The suggested adopted points of reference are those corresponding to adult electrocardiographic methodology.

摘要

目的

比较STAN和诺丁汉胎儿心电图(FECG)监护仪记录的T:QRS比值。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

伦敦教学医院分娩套房及研究单位。

方法与研究对象

使用计算机生成的心电图信号以及分娩期间记录的11例足月胎儿的信号,同时记录并比较STAN和诺丁汉FECG监护仪生成的T:QRS比值。

结果

对于计算机生成的信号,两种系统之间的一致性水平尚可,但对于分娩期间记录的胎儿信号,其一致性在临床上不可接受。T:QRS值的差异可能是由于S-T段和T波高度测量的参考点不同所致。

结论

S-T段和T波高度测量的不同参考点可以解释两种FECG波形分析方法之间一致性较差的原因。建议采用的参考点是与成人心电图方法相对应的那些点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验