Powell J J, Murray G D, O'Dwyer P J
Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Apr;4(2):109-12. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.109.
With the increasing popularity of laparoscopic prosthetic inguinal hernia repair, it was decided to compare the various staples and prostheses currently in use. A twofold increase in breaking or opening strength was required to disrupt the Endoscopic Multifeed Staple (31.2 Newtons vs 15.6 Newtons) compared with the Multifire Endo Hernia Staple. A linear relationship existed between the number of staples used and the maximum load tolerated. No significant difference was found between the breaking strength of the prostheses evaluated. Further research into the biomechanics of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is necessary to determine how important staple and prosthesis strength is for the success of the repair.
随着腹腔镜人工腹股沟疝修补术越来越普及，人们决定对目前使用的各种吻合钉和补片进行比较。与多连发内镜疝吻合钉相比，破坏内镜多送料吻合钉（31.2牛顿对15.6牛顿）所需的断裂或开启强度增加了两倍。使用的吻合钉数量与耐受的最大负荷之间存在线性关系。在所评估的补片的断裂强度之间未发现显著差异。有必要对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的生物力学进行进一步研究，以确定吻合钉和补片强度对修补成功的重要性。
