Pacala J T, McBride P E, Gray S L
Department of Family Practice and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis.
Drugs Aging. 1994 May;4(5):366-78. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199404050-00002.
Although the strength of total cholesterol levels as a relative risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) declines with age, the prevalence of CHD increases dramatically with age. Data from cholesterol treatment trials, although sparse in older adults, suggest that dyslipidaemia treatment has the potential to prevent CHD. In particular, dyslipidaemia treatment appears to be most beneficial in older adults with a history of CHD or who have several other CHD risk factors. Dyslipidaemia screening should be selective in the elderly, reserved for those whose health status would be amenable to nutritional or pharmacological therapy, and in whom several CHD risk factors or a history of CHD are present. Since high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels retain their inverse association CHD in old age, cholesterol subfractions should be measured in persons being screened in order to adequately assess the severity of dyslipidaemia. Treatment decisions should be guided by the patient's dyslipidaemic class, which is determined by the cholesterol subfractions and serum triglycerides (TG). As in younger persons, nutritional therapy remains the first step in dyslipidaemia management in high risk, nondebilitated older adults. An array of cholesterol modifying medications are available which vary widely in treatment effects, adverse effects and cost. Extra care needs to be taken in prescribing these agents in older adults because of greater potential for adverse effects and interactions with other medications. The cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatment decreases with age and increases with the severity of dyslipidaemia, a history of CHD, or the presence of multiple CHD risk factors. When comparing elderly to middle-aged adults, the relative cost-effectiveness of different cholesterol-lowering medications may be altered due to age-related changes in therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects.
尽管总胆固醇水平作为冠心病(CHD)相对风险因素的强度会随着年龄增长而下降,但冠心病的患病率却会随着年龄的增长而急剧上升。胆固醇治疗试验的数据,虽然在老年人中较为稀少,但表明血脂异常治疗有预防冠心病的潜力。特别是,血脂异常治疗似乎对有冠心病病史或有其他几种冠心病风险因素的老年人最为有益。血脂异常筛查在老年人中应具有选择性,适用于那些健康状况适合营养或药物治疗且存在几种冠心病风险因素或有冠心病病史的人。由于高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL)水平在老年时仍与冠心病呈负相关,因此在接受筛查的人群中应测量胆固醇亚组分,以便充分评估血脂异常的严重程度。治疗决策应以患者的血脂异常类别为指导,该类别由胆固醇亚组分和血清甘油三酯(TG)决定。与年轻人一样,营养治疗仍然是高危、非虚弱老年人血脂异常管理的第一步。有一系列可改变胆固醇的药物,其治疗效果、不良反应和成本差异很大。由于老年人使用这些药物产生不良反应以及与其他药物相互作用的可能性更大,因此在为老年人开这些药物时需要格外小心。药物治疗的成本效益随年龄增长而降低,随血脂异常的严重程度、冠心病病史或多种冠心病风险因素的存在而增加。在比较老年人和中年人时,由于治疗效果和不良反应的年龄相关变化,不同降胆固醇药物的相对成本效益可能会改变。