• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电生理学家对100台采用非开胸导联系统的连续心脏复律除颤器进行植入操作。

Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with nonthoracotomy lead systems.

作者信息

Strickberger S A, Hummel J D, Daoud E, Niebauer M, Williamson B D, Man K C, Horwood L, Schmittou A, Kalbfleisch S J, Langberg J J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 18109-0022.

出版信息

Circulation. 1994 Aug;90(2):868-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.868.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.90.2.868
PMID:8044958
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional lead systems for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) require a thoracotomy for placement. Nonthoracotomy lead systems are available and are usually implanted by an electrophysiologist and a surgeon. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation with a nonthoracotomy lead system by electrophysiologists.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A consecutive series of 100 patients (mean age, 61 +/- 13 years, +/- SD) underwent ICD implantation with a nonthoracotomy lead system while intubated and under general anesthesia. Seventy-seven patients had coronary artery disease, 15 had idiopathic cardiomyopathy, 6 had miscellaneous heart disease, and 2 had structurally normal hearts. The mean ejection fraction was 0.29 +/- 0.13. Sixty-eight patients had suffered a cardiac arrest, and 32 had had ventricular tachycardia or syncope. All patients except 9 underwent electrophysiological testing and had failed 1 +/- 1 drug trials before ICD implantation. Three types of nonthoracotomy lead systems were used. The nonthoracotomy lead with an ICD was successfully implanted in 96 patients (96%). Of the unsuccessful implants, 1 patient did not have venous access, the passive fixation lead in 1 would not remain lodged, 1 had elevated defibrillation thresholds, and 1 developed a hemopneumothorax while venous access was being obtained. The mean defibrillation threshold was 17 +/- 6 J. The mean procedure duration was 161 +/- 57 minutes. When a subcutaneous patch was used (n = 58), the procedure duration was 189 +/- 5 minutes, and when a subcutaneous patch was not required (n = 40), the procedure lasted 123 +/- 37 minutes (P < .0001). Patients remained in the hospital 4.5 +/- 4.1 days after implantation, with no procedure-related deaths. Acute complications occurred in 10 patients; 2 had lead dislodgments, 1 with previous abdominal surgery had his abdominal cavity entered (without other complications) while the ICD pocket was being made, 1 had postoperative heart failure, 1 developed a large hematoma when anticoagulation therapy was initiated, 3 required reintubation because of excessive anesthesia, 1 developed superficial cellulitis, and 1 developed a hemopneumothorax secondary to a lacerated subclavian vein. During 6 +/- 3 months of follow-up, 2 patients developed lead fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Electrophysiologists can implant an ICD with a nonthoracotomy lead system safely and with a high success rate; (2) use of a subcutaneous patch correlates with longer procedure durations; and (3) special precautions should be taken in patients with previous abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景

传统的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导联系统需要开胸植入。非开胸导联系统已有应用,通常由电生理学家和外科医生植入。本研究的目的是前瞻性评估电生理学家使用非开胸导联系统植入ICD的安全性和有效性。

方法与结果

连续100例患者(平均年龄61±13岁,±标准差)在插管全身麻醉下接受非开胸导联系统的ICD植入。77例患者患有冠状动脉疾病,15例患有特发性心肌病,6例患有其他心脏病,2例心脏结构正常。平均射血分数为0.29±0.13。68例患者曾发生心脏骤停,32例曾发生室性心动过速或晕厥。除9例患者外,所有患者均接受了电生理检查,且在ICD植入前1±1次药物试验失败。使用了三种类型的非开胸导联系统。带ICD的非开胸导联成功植入96例患者(96%)。植入失败的患者中,1例没有静脉通路,1例被动固定导联无法固定,1例除颤阈值升高,1例在获取静脉通路时发生血气胸。平均除颤阈值为17±6J。平均手术时间为161±57分钟。使用皮下贴片时(n = 58),手术时间为189±5分钟,不使用皮下贴片时(n = 40),手术持续123±37分钟(P <.0001)。患者植入后住院4.5±4.1天,无手术相关死亡。10例患者发生急性并发症;2例导联移位,1例曾接受腹部手术,在制作ICD囊袋时腹腔被打开(无其他并发症),1例术后发生心力衰竭,1例开始抗凝治疗时出现大血肿,3例因麻醉过量需要重新插管,1例发生浅表蜂窝织炎,1例因锁骨下静脉撕裂继发血气胸。在6±3个月的随访期间,2例患者发生导联骨折。

结论

(1)电生理学家可以安全地使用非开胸导联系统植入ICD,成功率高;(2)使用皮下贴片与手术时间延长相关;(3)既往有腹部手术史的患者应采取特殊预防措施。

相似文献

1
Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with nonthoracotomy lead systems.电生理学家对100台采用非开胸导联系统的连续心脏复律除颤器进行植入操作。
Circulation. 1994 Aug;90(2):868-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.868.
2
Electrophysiological laboratory, electrophysiologist-implanted, nonthoracotomy-implantable cardioverter/defibrillators.电生理实验室,电生理学家植入的,非开胸植入式心脏复律除颤器。
Circulation. 1994 Jun;89(6):2503-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.6.2503.
3
Transvenous defibrillator systems implanted by electrophysiologists in the catheterization laboratory.由电生理学家在导管室植入的经静脉除颤器系统。
Clin Cardiol. 1997 Feb;20(2):117-24. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960200207.
4
Comparison of implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillators in the operating room versus the electrophysiology laboratory.非开胸除颤器在手术室与电生理实验室植入的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Feb 1;75(4):255-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(95)80031-m.
5
Postoperative lead-related complications in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems.非开胸除颤导联系统患者术后与导联相关的并发症
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Sep;26(3):776-86. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00244-X.
6
Clinical results with electrophysiologist-implanted cardioverter-defibrillators.电生理学家植入式心脏复律除颤器的临床结果。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 2):189-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04840.x.
7
Electrophysiologist-implanted transvenous cardioverter defibrillators using local versus general anesthesia.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):96-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00654.x.
8
Determinants of successful nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: experience in 101 patients using two different lead systems.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1835-42. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90766-t.
9
Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式经静脉心脏复律除颤器
Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1152-68. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1152.
10
[Transvenous subcutaneous implantation technique of the cardioverter/defibrillator].[心脏复律除颤器的经静脉皮下植入技术]
Herz. 1994 Oct;19(5):259-77.

引用本文的文献

1
[Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. How much anesthesia is necessary?].[植入式心脏复律除颤器。需要多少麻醉?]
Anaesthesist. 2010 Jun;59(6):507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1737-3.
2
Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation.单极胸壁除颤的经验。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 1997 Mar;8(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03042475.
3
Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel.心脏手术的静脉镇静可由非麻醉人员安全且经济高效地实施。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Jan;21(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9191-0. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
4
Complications and mortality of single versus dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.单腔与双腔植入式心脏复律除颤器的并发症及死亡率
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006 Apr 1;6(2):75-83.
5
Safety and potential cost savings of same-setting electrophysiologic testing and placement of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.同场所进行电生理检查及经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器置入的安全性及潜在成本节约
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Sep;24(9):592-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240905.
6
Subpectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation using a lateral approach.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000 Dec;4(4):611-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1026569700036.
7
Effect of general anesthesia on the defibrillation energy requirement in patients undergoing defibrillator implantation.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Dec;3(4):325-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1009831802964.
8
[Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].[心脏病学进展。I:电生理学]
Med Klin (Munich). 1999 Jan 15;94(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/BF03044691.
9
A comparison of pectoral and abdominal transvenous defibrillator implantation: analysis of costs and outcomes.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Dec;2(4):345-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1009756520054.
10
Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.90微法三电极除颤系统与125微法双电极除颤系统的随机比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Mar;2(1):41-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1009760706944.