• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Shifting the responsibility for payment for state hospital services to community mental health agencies.

作者信息

Cuffel B J, Wait D, Head T

机构信息

Institute for Mental Health Services Research, Berkeley, CA 94704.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 May;45(5):460-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.5.460.

DOI:10.1176/ps.45.5.460
PMID:8045541
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 1990 the state of Arkansas shifted financial responsibility for state hospital services to community mental health centers; through a policy known as "bed buy-back," centers now authorize all state hospital admissions and prospectively purchase bed days for their patients. Characteristics of patients hospitalized before and after implementation of the policy were examined to determine how the policy affected hospital admission rates, types of patients admitted, and the amount of contact between CMHC and hospital staff about admitted patients, as well as how these elements were affected differently in rural and urban areas.

METHODS

Changes in the types of patients admitted over the 13 months before and 14 months after the change in financing were studied through retrospective chart review of 648 patients. Administrative data were used to examine changes in numbers of admissions for 30 months before and 26 months afterward. Data were analyzed by piecewise regression, least-squares, and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

After financial decentralization, state hospital use was reduced in both urban and rural areas, although the reduction in urban areas was proportionally greater. Contrary to expectation, admissions were not limited to the most severely ill, disruptive, or substance-abusing patients, nor were they more likely to be readmitted. For patients who were admitted, communication between the community and the state hospital was greater than before financial decentralization.

CONCLUSIONS

Shifting financial responsibility for patient care significantly reduced state hospital use, did not affect patient mix, and apparently increased coordination of care between community and hospital. Whether bed buy-back has affected the kind or quality of services delivered in the community awaits further study.

摘要

相似文献

1
Shifting the responsibility for payment for state hospital services to community mental health agencies.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 May;45(5):460-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.5.460.
2
State funds needed for proper care of Central State patients.妥善照料中央州立医院患者所需的国家资金。
Indiana Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;85(5):368-9.
3
The impact of closing a state psychiatric hospital on the county mental health system and its clients.关闭一家州立精神病院对县心理健康系统及其服务对象的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Oct;50(10):1297-302. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.10.1297.
4
Cost comparison of state hospital and community-based care for seriously mentally ill adults.针对成年重症精神病患者的公立医院与社区照护的成本比较
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;155(4):523-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.4.523.
5
Service utilization and cost of community care for discharged state hospital patients: a 3-year follow-up study.州立医院出院患者社区护理的服务利用情况及成本:一项为期3年的随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):920-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.920.
6
Assessing the effectiveness of recovery-oriented ACT in reducing state psychiatric hospital use.评估以康复为导向的接纳与承诺疗法在减少州立精神病院使用方面的效果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):303-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200095.
7
Testing the limits of deinstitutionalization.检验去机构化的极限。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Jun;46(6):569-74. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.6.569.
8
The least restrictive alternative in the postinstitutional era.机构后时代限制最少的替代方案。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Oct;44(10):967-73. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.10.967.
9
Impact of assertive community treatment on the use of state hospital inpatient bed-days.积极社区治疗对州立医院住院日使用情况的影响。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;44(9):833-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.9.833.
10
Violent and destructive behavior among the severely mentally ill in rural areas: evidence from Arkansas' community mental health system.
Community Ment Health J. 1994 Oct;30(5):495-504. doi: 10.1007/BF02189065.

引用本文的文献

1
The potential impact of the recovery movement on family interventions for schizophrenia: opportunities and obstacles.康复运动对精神分裂症家庭干预的潜在影响:机遇与障碍。
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jul;32(3):451-63. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj066. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
2
Managed care in the public mental health system.
Community Ment Health J. 1996 Apr;32(2):109-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02249749.