Suppr超能文献

吡洛芬与萘普生治疗类风湿关节炎所致严重胃损伤的比较:一项内镜对照研究。

A comparison of severe gastric damage as a result of pirprofen and naproxen treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled endoscopic study.

作者信息

Montrone F, Petrillo M, Caruso I, Bianchi Porro G

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Unit, L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Intern Med. 1994 Aug;236(2):153-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01277.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this controlled endoscopic study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and the gastric tolerance of two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pirprofen versus naproxen.

DESIGN

A randomized endoscopic double-blind double-dummy study.

SETTING

The gastrointestinal unit of a teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

Forty patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled. After an initial upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to rule out the presence of gastric mucosal lesions, the patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind, double-dummy manner, to receive either pirprofen (400 mg t.i.d.) or naproxen (500 mg b.i.d.) for 4 weeks; endoscopic control followed this treatment period, or was anticipated in the event of painful dyspepsia.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopy at the beginning of the study and at 4 weeks, or anticipated in the event of painful dyspepsia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure of the study was the possibility that pirprofen was less toxic to the gastric mucosa than naproxen, and at least as effective.

RESULTS

Both drugs proved effective in relieving clinical symptoms, without a statistically significant difference. Gastric mucosa lesions were observed in 90% of pirprofen-treated patients and in 60% of those on naproxen (P = 0.03). The most severe lesions (grades 3 and 4) were found in 65% of subjects treated with pirprofen, as opposed to 15% of those treated with naproxen (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that pirprofen is at least as active as naproxen in relieving rheumatic symptoms, but its administration results in a significantly severe degree of gastric damage.

摘要

目的

本对照内镜研究旨在比较两种非甾体抗炎药吡洛芬与萘普生的治疗效果及对胃的耐受性。

设计

随机内镜双盲双模拟研究。

地点

一所教学医院的胃肠科。

研究对象

招募了40名类风湿性关节炎患者。在进行初步上消化道内镜检查以排除胃黏膜病变后,患者以双盲、双模拟的方式随机分配,接受吡洛芬(400毫克,每日三次)或萘普生(500毫克,每日两次)治疗4周;治疗期结束后进行内镜检查,或在出现疼痛性消化不良时进行内镜检查。

干预措施

在研究开始时和4周时进行内镜检查,或在出现疼痛性消化不良时进行内镜检查。

主要观察指标

该研究的主要观察指标是吡洛芬对胃黏膜的毒性低于萘普生且至少具有同等疗效的可能性。

结果

两种药物在缓解临床症状方面均被证明有效,且无统计学显著差异。在接受吡洛芬治疗的患者中,90%观察到胃黏膜病变,而在接受萘普生治疗的患者中,这一比例为60%(P = 0.03)。在接受吡洛芬治疗的患者中,65%出现了最严重的病变(3级和4级),而接受萘普生治疗的患者中这一比例为15%(P = 0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,吡洛芬在缓解风湿症状方面至少与萘普生一样有效,但其给药会导致明显更严重的胃损伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验