Dobkins K R, Albright T D
Vision Center Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037.
J Neurosci. 1994 Aug;14(8):4854-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04854.1994.
Neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of macaque cerebral cortex are highly selective for the direction of motion but not the color of a moving stimulus. Recent experiments have shown, however, that the directional selectivity of many MT neurons persists even when a moving stimulus is defined solely by chromatic variation (Charles and Logothetis, 1989; Saito et al., 1989; Dobkins and Albright, 1991 a, b; Movshon et al., 1991; Gegenfurtner et al., 1994). To illuminate the mechanisms by which area MT uses color as a cue for motion correspondence, we recorded from MT neurons while rhesus monkeys viewed an "apparent motion" stimulus in which red/green sine wave gratings underwent contrast reversal each time they were displaced in a particular direction. Under such conditions, correspondence based upon chromatically defined borders conflicts with correspondence based upon conservation of chromatic sign. When our heterochromatic stimuli possessed sufficient luminance modulation, MT neurons responded best to motion in the direction for which the sign of luminance (and chromatic) contrast was preserved. At isoluminance, however, two different chromatic influences were revealed. First, when stimuli underwent small spatial displacements, directional selectivity was elicited by movement of the stimulus in the direction of the nearest chromatically defined border, even though the sign of chromatic contrast at that border alternated over time. Under these conditions, MT neurons apparently exploited information about image borders defined by chromatic contrast while sacrificing information about the colors that make up those borders. By contrast, when chromatically defined borders provided only ambiguous information about direction of motion, MT neurons were capable of using information about the sign of chromatic contrast to detect direction of motion. The results from these experiments suggest the existence of a hybrid mechanism, one in which both signed and unsigned chromatic signals contribute to motion processing in visual area MT.
猕猴大脑皮层颞中视觉区(MT)的神经元对运动方向具有高度选择性,但对移动刺激的颜色不敏感。然而,最近的实验表明,即使移动刺激仅由颜色变化定义,许多MT神经元的方向选择性仍然存在(查尔斯和洛戈塞蒂斯,1989年;斋藤等人,1989年;多布金斯和奥尔布赖特,1991年a、b;莫夫尚等人,1991年;盖根富特纳等人,1994年)。为了阐明MT区将颜色用作运动对应线索的机制,我们在恒河猴观看“表观运动”刺激时记录了MT神经元的活动,在该刺激中,红/绿正弦波光栅每次沿特定方向移动时都会发生对比度反转。在这种情况下,基于颜色定义边界的对应与基于颜色符号守恒的对应相互冲突。当我们的异色刺激具有足够的亮度调制时,MT神经元对亮度(和颜色)对比度符号得以保留的方向上的运动反应最佳。然而,在等亮度条件下,揭示了两种不同的颜色影响。首先,当刺激进行小的空间位移时,即使该边界处的颜色对比度符号随时间交替变化,刺激沿最近的颜色定义边界方向移动仍会引发方向选择性。在这些条件下,MT神经元显然利用了由颜色对比度定义的图像边界信息,同时牺牲了构成这些边界的颜色信息。相比之下,当颜色定义的边界仅提供关于运动方向的模糊信息时,MT神经元能够利用颜色对比度符号信息来检测运动方向。这些实验结果表明存在一种混合机制,其中有符号和无符号的颜色信号都对视觉区域MT的运动处理有贡献。