Soper N J, Brunt L M
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Surg Clin North Am. 1994 Aug;74(4):953-9.
The debate over routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy continues because of a paucity of objective data to support or refute the case for either approach. The introduction of fluoroscopic techniques during the performance of cholangiography is an important step forward because it decreases the operative time for the technique and because real-time visualization may also diminish the number of false-positive and false-negative results. Routine cholangiography improves the surgeon's ability to delineate the biliary anatomy when the need arises and undoubtedly facilitates the development of skills useful for the laparoscopic management of common bile duct calculi. Normal results on intraoperative cholangiography are also reassuring to the surgeon, given the current visual and tactile limitations of laparoscopy. As a result of these considerations as well as our procurement of a digital fluoroscopic system and the need to train surgical residents in cholangiographic techniques, we have adopted a policy of routine fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography on all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
由于缺乏客观数据来支持或反驳腹腔镜胆囊切除术中常规与选择性术中胆管造影的做法,关于这两种方法的争论仍在继续。在胆管造影过程中引入荧光透视技术是向前迈出的重要一步,因为它减少了该技术的手术时间,而且实时可视化也可能减少假阳性和假阴性结果的数量。当需要时,常规胆管造影可提高外科医生描绘胆道解剖结构的能力,并且无疑有助于培养对腹腔镜处理胆总管结石有用的技能。考虑到目前腹腔镜检查在视觉和触觉上的局限性,术中胆管造影的正常结果也让外科医生安心。出于这些考虑,以及我们购置了数字荧光透视系统和培训外科住院医师胆管造影技术的需要,我们对所有接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者采取了常规荧光透视术中胆管造影的策略。