Dodd K L, Rhead S, Towey K
Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby.
Arch Dis Child. 1994 Jun;70(6):493-5; discussion 495-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.6.493.
The value of and need for paediatric outpatient review attendance as perceived by parents, children, consultants, and general practitioners (GPs) were assessed. One hundred and ninety one parents of 239 children over 7 years of age undergoing review were randomly selected for a semistructured interview. For each parent interviewed, an audit questionnaire was completed after case note review by another paediatrician. A random sample of the patients' GPs was surveyed by postal questionnaire. Twenty per cent of parents and 26% of GPs felt that the GP could care for the child as well as or better than the hospital, whereas only 6% of consultants felt this to be so. Regarding future attendance of the child at the hospital, 48% of parents and 32% of GPs felt the child could either be discharged or seen when parents were worried, whereas consultants felt 24% of patients should have been discharged.
评估了家长、儿童、顾问医生和全科医生(GP)对儿科门诊复诊的重视程度和必要性。随机选择了191名年龄超过7岁且正在接受复诊的239名儿童的家长进行半结构化访谈。对于每位接受访谈的家长,在另一位儿科医生查阅病历后完成一份审计问卷。通过邮寄问卷对患者的全科医生进行随机抽样调查。20%的家长和26%的全科医生认为全科医生能够或比医院更好地照顾孩子,而只有6%的顾问医生持此观点。关于孩子未来在医院的复诊,48%的家长和32%的全科医生认为孩子可以出院,或者在家长担心时就诊,而顾问医生认为24%的患者本应出院。