Bell R, David N, Burrows P, House A K
Department of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Nedlands.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Aug;64(8):565-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02288.x.
There is no agreement on the best technique of in situ flushing of livers prior to storage. In order to study this, porcine livers were stored in the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for 18 h and then assessed using an isolated perfused porcine model. Livers flushed in situ with UW solution were compared to livers flushed with a non-preservation solution (Hartmann's solution). No statistically significant differences could be found in bile production (18.7 +/- 4.4 vs 17.9 +/- 3.8mL/1000 g per 2 h), aspartate amino-transferase (AST) levels in the perfusate after 2 h of isolated perfusion (687 +/- 101 vs 724 +/- 114 U/L), potassium levels in the perfusate after 2 h on the circuit (5.4 +/- 1.5 vs 5.5 +/- 2.3 mmol/L), weight gain (15.2 +/- 3.7 vs 17.1 +/- 4.0%) or platelet sequestration (41.6 +/- 11.7 vs 37.4 +/- 9.8%) between livers flushed with UW solution as opposed to those flushed with Hartmann's solution, respectively. Of overriding importance was the solution in which the liver was stored, reconfirming the superiority of UW solution over an extracellular solution for preservation. If extrapolated to the clinical situation, these findings would have substantial cost-saving implications.
在肝脏保存前原位冲洗的最佳技术方面尚无定论。为了对此进行研究,将猪肝在威斯康星大学(UW)溶液中保存18小时,然后使用离体灌注猪模型进行评估。将用UW溶液原位冲洗的肝脏与用非保存溶液(哈特曼溶液)冲洗的肝脏进行比较。在胆汁生成量(每2小时18.7±4.4对17.9±3.8mL/1000g)、离体灌注2小时后灌注液中天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)水平(687±101对724±114U/L)、循环2小时后灌注液中钾水平(5.4±1.5对5.5±2.3mmol/L)、重量增加(15.2±3.7对17.1±4.0%)或血小板滞留率(41.6±11.7对37.4±9.8%)方面,用UW溶液冲洗的肝脏与用哈特曼溶液冲洗的肝脏之间均未发现统计学上的显著差异。最为重要的是肝脏保存所用的溶液,再次证实了UW溶液在保存方面优于细胞外溶液。如果将这些发现外推至临床情况,将会产生巨大的成本节约意义。