• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The evaluation of expert diagnostic systems. How to assess outcomes and quality parameters?

作者信息

Nøhr C

机构信息

Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark.

出版信息

Artif Intell Med. 1994 Apr;6(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/0933-3657(94)90041-8.

DOI:10.1016/0933-3657(94)90041-8
PMID:8049753
Abstract

Improvement of the quality in health care and the assessment of health outcomes of medical technologies have attracted an increasing attention in the implementation phases. In this paper 10 recent evaluation studies are reviewed to investigate to what extent they reflect the structure, process, and outcome of the conceptual framework. It is found that all the evaluation studies focus on structure measures. But if computer programs to support medical decision making are to be considered in the planning process of the health care system, the evaluation studies must strive to evaluate process and outcomes measures as well. A proposal for a framework for this kind of exploratory and evaluative research is outlined.

摘要

相似文献

1
The evaluation of expert diagnostic systems. How to assess outcomes and quality parameters?
Artif Intell Med. 1994 Apr;6(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/0933-3657(94)90041-8.
2
Evaluating evaluations of medical diagnostic systems.评估医学诊断系统的评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Nov-Dec;3(6):429-31. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.97084516.
3
Health-care technology transfer: expert and information systems for developing countries.
Methods Inf Med. 1997 Feb;36(2):69-78.
4
Measuring the quality of diagnostic hypothesis sets for studies of decision support.衡量用于决策支持研究的诊断假设集的质量。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;52 Pt 2:864-8.
5
Medical diagnosis: are expert systems needed?
Int J Biomed Comput. 1987 Jan;20(1-2):123-33. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(87)90020-1.
6
Iliad: a diagnostic consultant and patient simulator.
MD Comput. 1991 Jan-Feb;8(1):46-53.
7
Evaluating the appropriateness of a nurse expert system's patient assessment.
Comput Nurs. 1992 Nov-Dec;10(6):243-9. doi: 10.1097/00024665-199211000-00004.
8
Validation of expert systems: examples and considerations.
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1071-5.
9
Colonic lesion expert system. Performance evaluation.结肠病变专家系统。性能评估。
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1988 Apr;10(2):150-9.
10
Computerized screening devices and performance assessment: development of a policy towards automation. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.计算机化筛查设备与性能评估:自动化政策的制定。国际细胞学会工作组总结。《迈向21世纪的诊断细胞学:国际专家会议与教程》
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):59-68. doi: 10.1159/000331535.