Peters U H
Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie und Psychiatrie, Universität zu Köln.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1994 May;62(5):137-46. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996665.
In the course of a long-term historical development, two different systems of reference evolved in German and Anglo-American psychiatry. Which now confront each other, obviously without actually mixing. Based on classical German philosophy, in Germany the ideas of clinical vignette (Krankheitsbild) and phenomenon-symptom (Phänomen) were on developed. Based on classical English philosophy, English and American psychiatry for long periods were just interested in the best possible humane care for the mentally ill, but not in diagnosing clinical entities or in diagnostic classification. During the two last decades, a first comprehensive classification system, based on the redefinition of criteria by contemporary American philosophy, has been developed. In a short time this system has gained international significance. Both reference systems are outlined in respect of their historical development and differences to make these differences apprehensible by the reader. Unreflected differences result in problems of understanding.
在长期的历史发展过程中,德国和英美精神病学形成了两种不同的参照体系。如今这两种体系相互对峙,显然并未实际融合。基于德国古典哲学,德国发展出了临床症候群(Krankheitsbild)和现象-症状(Phänomen)的概念。基于英国古典哲学,英美精神病学长期以来只关注为精神疾病患者提供尽可能人道的护理,而不关注临床实体的诊断或诊断分类。在过去二十年里,基于当代美国哲学对标准的重新定义,开发出了首个全面的分类系统。该系统在短时间内就获得了国际影响力。本文将概述这两种参照体系的历史发展及差异,以便读者理解这些差异。未经思考的差异会导致理解上的问题。