Ross-Lee B, Weiser M A
Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens 45701-2979.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 May;94(5):404-8, 411-3.
While healthcare reform proposals are debated at the national level, states continue to propose and implement reform measures to address Medicaid, health insurance, universal coverage and access, medical liability, and cost-containment. The authors examine the shared responsibility of the federal and state governments for healthcare regulation and the surprising number of powers that reside with the states. They review the major barriers to state reform represented by restrictions within Medicaid and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) legislation. Established state programs in Maryland, Hawaii, and Arizona are revisited, and innovative reforms in Oregon, Tennessee, and Washington are examined. Finally, the authors concentrate on the reform measures under way in the five most heavily DO-populated states, pointing out the potential for one of the big three (Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio) to emerge as a model for the larger states. They urge osteopathic physicians to exert influence, based on their record of serving the Medicaid and other underserved populations, in state settings where they can be most effective.
当医疗保健改革提案在国家层面进行辩论时,各州继续提出并实施改革措施,以解决医疗补助、医疗保险、全民覆盖与可及性、医疗责任以及成本控制等问题。作者们探讨了联邦政府和州政府在医疗保健监管方面的共同责任,以及各州所拥有的数量惊人的权力。他们审视了由医疗补助限制和1974年《雇员退休收入保障法》(ERISA)立法所代表的州改革的主要障碍。重新审视了马里兰州、夏威夷州和亚利桑那州已有的州项目,并研究了俄勒冈州、田纳西州和华盛顿州的创新改革。最后,作者们聚焦于五大人口最密集的州正在进行的改革措施,指出三大州(密歇根州、宾夕法尼亚州和俄亥俄州)之一有可能成为其他大州的典范。他们敦促整骨疗法医生凭借其为医疗补助和其他服务不足人群服务的记录,在他们能发挥最大作用的州环境中施加影响。