• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸治疗对安氏II类1分类错牙合个体生长发育的影响。

Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with Class II division 1 malocclusion.

作者信息

Bishara S E, Zaher A R, Cummins D M, Jakobsen J R

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):221-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0221:EOOTOT>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0221:EOOTOT>2.0.CO;2
PMID:8060018
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth potential and dentofacial characteristics of individuals with Class II, division 1 malocclusion over a 5-year period. The changes were compared to matched, untreated normal individuals. Lateral cephalograms were available on 91 treated Class II, division 1 cases. Of these, 44 individuals (21 males and 23 females) were treated with first premolar extractions and 47 (20 males and 27 females) were treated nonextraction. The Class II groups were compared to 35 normal individuals (20 males and 15 females) matched for age and sex. Pretreatment, the Class II individuals had larger overjet, deeper overbite, larger ANB angle, more retrusive mandible and a convex soft tissue profile. In addition, the upper and lower lips in males, and the lower lip in females were significantly more protrusive in the subjects that were eventually treated with the extraction of four first premolars. At the end of the 5-year observation period, there was an overall "normalization" of the skeletal relationships of the treated Class II subjects in both the extraction and the nonextraction groups when compared to normals. Treatment had a differential impact on the dental relationships as well as on lip prominence as a result of the extraction decision. At the end of the observation period, both males and females in the extraction group had more retrusive maxillary and mandibular incisors as well as more retrusive lips than the corresponding normals. In the nonextraction groups, there was a tendency for both the incisors and the lips to be relatively more protrusive.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定正畸治疗对Ⅱ类1分类错牙合个体在5年期间生长潜力和牙颌面特征的影响。将这些变化与匹配的未经治疗的正常个体进行比较。对91例接受治疗的Ⅱ类1分类病例进行了头颅侧位片分析。其中,44例个体(21例男性和23例女性)接受了拔除第一前磨牙治疗,47例(20例男性和27例女性)接受了不拔牙治疗。将Ⅱ类组与35例年龄和性别匹配的正常个体(20例男性和15例女性)进行比较。治疗前,Ⅱ类个体有更大的覆盖、更深的覆牙合、更大的ANB角、更后缩的下颌骨以及凸面型软组织侧貌。此外,最终接受拔除四颗第一前磨牙治疗的男性的上、下唇以及女性的下唇明显更突出。在5年观察期结束时,与正常个体相比,接受治疗的Ⅱ类受试者在拔牙组和不拔牙组中的骨骼关系总体上实现了“正常化”。由于拔牙决策,治疗对牙关系以及唇部突出度有不同影响。在观察期结束时,拔牙组的男性和女性的上颌和下颌切牙以及嘴唇比相应的正常个体更后缩。在不拔牙组中,切牙和嘴唇有相对更突出的趋势。

相似文献

1
Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with Class II division 1 malocclusion.正畸治疗对安氏II类1分类错牙合个体生长发育的影响。
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):221-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0221:EOOTOT>2.0.CO;2.
2
Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.未经治疗和已治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的下颌变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):661-73. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70227-6.
3
Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.拔牙与不拔牙治疗对安氏I类和II类患者的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):36-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0036:EOEANT>2.0.CO;2.
4
The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study.安氏II类1分类错牙合拔牙决策的形态学基础:一项对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Feb;107(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70127-3.
5
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.安氏II类1分类错牙合患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后的治疗及治疗后变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70297-x.
6
Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.安氏II类1分类错牙合患者非拔牙Begg矫治技术治疗中的骨骼与牙齿变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Dec;118(6):641-8. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.110584.
7
Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.安氏II类错牙合患者上颌第二磨牙拔除与不拔除治疗的头影测量比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Dec;120(6):608-13; quiz 677. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.119805.
8
Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.头影测量特征对采用不拔牙或拔除两颗上颌前磨牙矫治方案治疗的安氏II类错牙合畸形咬合成功率的影响。
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e63-71.
9
Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator.使用生物调节器治疗后软组织轮廓的变化。
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(6):423-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0423:CISTPF>2.0.CO;2.
10
Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.与成功治疗的拔牙和不拔牙安氏II类1分类错牙合相关的长期牙颌形态变化。
Angle Orthod. 2000 Jun;70(3):208-19. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0208:LTPCAW>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.系统前磨牙拔除对边缘性拔牙患者唇型、垂直向和头影测量参数的短期影响——一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):865-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1574-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
2
Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison.拔除上颌第一磨牙的二类错颌矫治或Herbst矫治器治疗:牙-骨骼及软组织效应的比较
J Orofac Orthop. 2013 Jan;74(1):52-63. doi: 10.1007/s00056-012-0112-1. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
3
Influence of facial growth pattern on outcome of extraction therapy.
面部生长模式对拔牙治疗效果的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 1997;58(3):154-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02676546.
4
The influence of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile.拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗对软组织侧貌的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 1996 Dec;57(6):354-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02215673.
5
Profile changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic treatment in a pair of identical twins.一对同卵双胞胎在拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗后的面部轮廓变化。
J Orofac Orthop. 1996 Feb;57(1):56-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02189050.