Heffline M S, Clark M L, Hooper V D, Mamaril M, Miller K M, Norris S, Poole E L, Summers S, Younger S
J Post Anesth Nurs. 1994 Aug;9(4):204-13.
This ASPAN survey was conducted by Research Committee members regarding the future of research for postanesthesia nursing and asked this question: What do postanesthesia nurses view as priorities for postanesthesia nursing research in various phases of practice? The design for the study was the Delphi technique, which uses a multiple, sequential survey to reach consensus among a group of experts. Four rounds of questionnaires were used to survey volunteer participants (N = 54). The group of experts remained stable (N = 41) for rounds 2 through 4. Findings from the survey indicated several areas of priorities for postanesthesia nursing. Of the top 10 ranked statements, 4 related to discharge criteria. Another high-priority area identified was pain management, with 5 statements pertaining to this subject being ranked in the top 10. Based on this small sample of postanesthesia nurses, this study provides a beginning step for prioritizing areas of research necessary to expand the body of knowledge for postanesthesia nursing.
这项美国麻醉后护理协会（ASPAN）的调查由研究委员会成员针对麻醉后护理的研究前景开展，并提出了这个问题：麻醉后护理人员认为在不同实践阶段，麻醉后护理研究的重点是什么？该研究采用德尔菲技术，即通过多次连续调查，在一组专家中达成共识。四轮问卷用于调查志愿者参与者（N = 54）。在第2轮至第4轮中，专家小组保持稳定（N = 41）。调查结果表明了麻醉后护理的几个重点领域。在排名前十的陈述中，有4条与出院标准相关。另一个确定的高优先领域是疼痛管理，有5条关于该主题的陈述位列前十。基于这一小部分麻醉后护理人员的样本，本研究为确定扩展麻醉后护理知识体系所需的研究领域优先级提供了初步步骤。
