Suppr超能文献

[尿激酶与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂在经导管动脉溶栓中的比较]

[Comparison of urokinase and tissue-type plasminogen activator in transcatheter arterial fibrinolysis].

作者信息

Vignali C, Cioni R, Mascalchi M, Russo R, Palla A, Lencioni R, Napoli V, Bartolozzi C

机构信息

Cattedra di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Pisa.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;88(1-2):93-9.

PMID:8066262
Abstract

The transcatheter injection of fibrinolytic agents is now the treatment of choice of the acute occlusions of the peripheral arteries. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of two fibrinolytic agents (urokinase and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in 83 consecutive patients: 37 with occlusion of surgical bypass grafts, 36 with occlusion of atheromatous vessels, 5 with post-angioplasty occlusion, 2 with post-traumatic thrombosis, 2 with cardiogenic emboli and 1 with thrombophilia. Recanalization was achieved in 55 of 59 (93%) patients treated with urokinase and in 21 of 24 (88%) patients treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (p > 0.05). The latter provided a more rapid recanalization than urokinase but was also responsible for the complications observed in all 10 (12%) patients. These results indicate that urokinase is to be preferred to recombinant tissue type plasminogen activator for routine arterial transcatheter fibrinolysis.

摘要

经导管注射纤溶药物目前是外周动脉急性闭塞的首选治疗方法。我们回顾性比较了83例连续患者使用两种纤溶药物(尿激酶和重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂)的疗效和安全性:37例为外科旁路移植血管闭塞,36例为动脉粥样硬化血管闭塞,5例为血管成形术后闭塞,2例为创伤后血栓形成,2例为心源性栓塞,1例为血栓形成倾向。接受尿激酶治疗的59例患者中有55例(93%)实现再通,接受重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗的24例患者中有21例(88%)实现再通(p>0.05)。重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂比尿激酶再通更快,但也是所有10例(12%)患者出现并发症的原因。这些结果表明,在常规动脉导管溶栓治疗中,尿激酶比重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验