Bremmelgaard A, Jansen J E, Justesen T, Gottschau A
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark.
APMIS. 1994 Jun;102(6):446-50.
The susceptibilities of 100 clinical isolates belonging to the Bacteroides fragilis group to 9 antibiotics, i.e. ampicillin, piperacillin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, imipenem, erythromycin, clindamycin, and metronidazole, were tested using a standard agar dilution method and the E-test. Overall, 81% of the E-test MICs were within one log2 dilution step of the agar dilution MICs and 95% were within two log2 dilution steps. The E-test showed significantly lower MIC values than the agar dilution method for ampicillin, cefotaxime, and imipenem, and significantly higher MIC values for piperacillin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, clindamycin, and metronidazole. However, this only resulted in minor discrepancies that did not change the susceptibility status. The E-test is easy to perform and read, and the MIC values correlated well with the MICs obtained by the agar dilution method when testing susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group.
采用标准琼脂稀释法和E试验,检测了100株脆弱拟杆菌属临床分离株对9种抗生素(即氨苄西林、哌拉西林、头孢曲松、头孢噻肟、头孢西丁、亚胺培南、红霉素、克林霉素和甲硝唑)的敏感性。总体而言,81%的E试验MIC值在琼脂稀释法MIC值的一个log2稀释倍数范围内,95%在两个log2稀释倍数范围内。E试验显示,氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和亚胺培南的MIC值显著低于琼脂稀释法,而哌拉西林、头孢曲松、红霉素、克林霉素和甲硝唑的MIC值显著高于琼脂稀释法。然而,这仅导致了微小差异,并未改变药敏状态。E试验易于操作和判读,在检测脆弱拟杆菌属药敏时,其MIC值与琼脂稀释法获得的MIC值相关性良好。