Polesky H F, Taswell H F
Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Jun;63(6 SUPPL):1002-6.
The results obtained by referees and participants on nine HBsAg survey panels are reviewed. Comparison of the two methods used by the majority of participants, counterelectrophoresis (CEP) and radioimmunoassay (RIA), shows that the latter consistently identifies a larger number of the positive samples. The RIA results show some problems with specificity, but these were reduced during the two-year period. The performance of the participants using CEP improved during the two-year period. The Survey documents the change in popularity of the methods.
对评审人员和参与者在九个乙肝表面抗原（HBsAg）检测小组中获得的结果进行了回顾。对大多数参与者使用的两种方法——对流免疫电泳（CEP）和放射免疫分析法（RIA）进行比较后发现，后者始终能鉴定出更多的阳性样本。放射免疫分析法的结果显示出一些特异性问题，但在两年期间这些问题有所减少。在两年期间，使用对流免疫电泳的参与者的表现有所改善。该调查记录了这些方法受欢迎程度的变化。
