Thomas R, Steele R, Smith R, Brannan W
Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112.
J Urol. 1994 Oct;152(4):1174-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32531-4.
Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is currently an accepted procedure for staging adenocarcinoma of the prostate. To assess the feasibility and efficacy of performing laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy during the same anesthesia, we retrospectively analyzed 98 patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate who were candidates for radical prostatectomy. Of the patients 12 (12%) underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection only since they had metastatic disease to the pelvic lymph nodes on frozen section evaluation (the Gleason pathological grade was 2 to 4 in 2 patients, 5 to 7 in 8 and 8 in 2). Of the remaining 86 patients who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy for definitive management 76 (88%) underwent 1-stage radical perineal prostatectomy immediately after laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, while 10 (12%) in the initial stages of our series underwent delayed perineal prostatectomy following laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (2-stage). The average postoperative hospital stay in the 1-stage group was 3.11 days, yet 19 (25%) patients were discharged from the hospital within 48 hours and another 39 (51%) within 72 hours. Thus, 76% of the patients were discharged from the hospital within 72 hours of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy. The advent of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy has found a resurgence at our institutions, with its lower morbidity rate and more rapid return to normal activity for these patients. Based on our results, we recommend laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection followed by radical perineal prostatectomy as a 1-stage treatment option for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术目前是前列腺腺癌分期的一种公认手术。为评估在同一麻醉下进行腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术和根治性会阴前列腺切除术的可行性和疗效,我们回顾性分析了98例临床局限性前列腺腺癌且适合行根治性前列腺切除术的患者。其中12例(12%)患者仅接受了腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术,因为他们在冰冻切片评估中发现盆腔淋巴结转移(2例患者Gleason病理分级为2至4级,8例为5至7级,2例为8级)。其余86例行根治性会阴前列腺切除术以进行确定性治疗的患者中,76例(88%)在腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术后立即进行了一期根治性会阴前列腺切除术,而在我们系列研究的初期,10例(12%)患者在腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术后进行了延迟会阴前列腺切除术(二期)。一期组的平均术后住院时间为3.11天,然而19例(25%)患者在48小时内出院,另有39例(51%)在72小时内出院。因此,76%的患者在腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术和根治性会阴前列腺切除术后72小时内出院。腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术和根治性会阴前列腺切除术的出现使我们机构重新采用了这种方法,因为它发病率较低,患者能更快恢复正常活动。基于我们的结果,我们推荐腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术加根治性会阴前列腺切除术作为局限性前列腺腺癌的一期治疗选择。