• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The economics of health care reform.

作者信息

Naslund M J

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Surgery (Urology), Baltimore.

出版信息

Urology. 1994 Sep;44(3):299-304. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80081-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80081-2
PMID:8073543
Abstract

Health care costs in the United States have been rising faster than most other goods and services for more than 20 years. The fundamental reason for this rise in cost is unbridled demand for health care services. Demand is high because those who receive the benefits (patients) pay a relatively small portion of the cost of their health insurance. The bulk of health insurance costs are paid by employers or the government for the majority of Americans. To control these rising costs, the demand for health care must be brought under control. This would be best accomplished by a system which requires each individual or family to pay for their own health insurance. This type of payment system would force consumers to become price sensitive and educated on different health insurance plan options. Controlling the demand for health care is the simplest way to control its cost, because in a competitive, consumer-driven market, providers would have to offer cost-effective health care. With this type of market-driven system, appropriate price and utilization levels for health care would be reached within the context of future economic growth and living standards.

摘要

相似文献

1
The economics of health care reform.
Urology. 1994 Sep;44(3):299-304. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80081-2.
2
The 2009 Health Confidence Survey: public opinion on health reform varies; strong support for insurance market reform and public plan option, mixed response to tax cap.2009年健康信心调查:公众对医疗改革的看法不一;对保险市场改革和公共计划选项大力支持,对税收上限反应不一。
EBRI Issue Brief. 2009 Jul(331):1-16.
3
Three years in - changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace.三年来,美国医保市场不断调整计划特色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3.
4
Dual choice health insurance policy: a proposal and a cost analysis.双重选择健康保险政策:一项提议及成本分析。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):60-70.
5
Flunking economics?
Natl J (Wash). 1994 Mar 12;26(11):581-6.
6
Small employers and self-insured health benefits: too small to succeed?小型雇主与自保健康福利:规模太小而无法成功?
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2012 Jul(138):1-4.
7
Cost trends expected to rise. Earnings are strong despite reform, insurers say.成本趋势预计将上升。保险公司称,尽管进行了改革,但盈利状况依然强劲。
Mod Healthc. 2011 May 9;41(19):14.
8
The role of the health care sector in the U.S. economy.美国医疗保健行业在美国经济中的作用。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1993 Oct(142):1-31.
9
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in Massachusetts Did Not Change the Trajectory of Arthroplasty Use or Costs.马萨诸塞州的全民医疗保险覆盖范围并未改变关节置换术的使用轨迹或成本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1090-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4643-9. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Employer-sponsored health insurance: down but not out.雇主赞助的医疗保险:虽受冲击但未消亡。
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2011 Oct(137):1-5.