Sano H, Shitara T, Okamoto M, Hirayama M
Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Japan.
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1994;514:21-6. doi: 10.3109/00016489409127552.
Hearing levels in patients with sudden deafness are commonly discussed in terms of average thresholds at 3 or 5 frequencies, but an investigation of hearing levels at a single frequency is also important. In this paper, pure tone thresholds at 500 Hz and 4,000 Hz were investigated in patients with sudden deafness who came to our clinic within 4 days of onset. Particular attention was paid to the relationship between audiometric types according to the contour of the initial loss and degree of hearing recovery at each frequency. In the group of patients whose initial hearing level at 500 Hz was between 55 and 70 dB, the hearing recovery at 500 Hz in the upward slope type was significantly greater than that in the downward slope type, but in other groups no significant differences in hearing recovery were observed among the different types of initial audiograms. We considered that the hearing recovery at a single frequency was not related to the audiometric type except in the patients with the upward slope type with moderate hearing loss.
突发性耳聋患者的听力水平通常根据3个或5个频率的平均阈值来讨论,但对单个频率的听力水平进行研究也很重要。在本文中,我们对发病4天内前来我院就诊的突发性耳聋患者的500Hz和4000Hz纯音阈值进行了研究。特别关注了根据初始听力损失曲线划分的听力图类型与每个频率听力恢复程度之间的关系。在初始500Hz听力水平在55至70dB之间的患者组中,上升型听力图患者在500Hz的听力恢复明显大于下降型,但在其他组中,不同类型初始听力图的听力恢复未观察到显著差异。我们认为,除了中度听力损失的上升型听力图患者外,单个频率的听力恢复与听力图类型无关。