Wilson L D, Ennis R, Percarpio B, Peschel R E
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jul 30;29(5):1133-8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90410-3.
Although modern computerized tomography scans have revolutionized the three-dimensional treatment planning for external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer, the prostate apex is often difficult to precisely define. Some institutions routinely use the ischial tuberosities to define the lower border of external beam fields for prostate cancer, while others recommend a retrograde urethrogram. This study was undertaken to estimate the accuracy of using the bottom of the ischial tuberosities to define the lower border of the external beam fields for Stages T1, T2, and T3 prostate cancer.
The anatomic location of the apex of the prostate was determined in 153 implant patients either by direct surgical exposure of the prostate (133 patients) or by using transrectal ultrasound (20 patients). The prostate apex position relative to the ischial tuberosities was determined and plotted on a schematic of the bony pelvic structures drawn to scale.
There was excellent agreement in the estimate of the location of the prostate apex between the two methods (surgery vs. ultrasound) used. The prostate apex was located above the ischial tuberosities in 152 of the 153 patients studied (99.3%). Seven of the 153 patients (4.6%) had a prostate apex which was less than 1.5 cm above the ischial tuberosities and 3 of the 153 patients (2%) had an apex-tuberosity distance of less than 1 cm.
This study indicates that locating the inferior border of the external beam fields at the ischial tuberosity adequately treats at least 95.4% of all prostate patients with a margin of 1.5 centimeters or more below the prostate apex. In addition, the external beam policy of locating the inferior border at the ischial tuberosities has produced: (a) excellent 10-year clinical local control rates of 88% for Stage T1 and T2 patients and 82% for Stage T3 patients, and (b) 5-year and 10-year biochemical (normal prostate specific antigen) and clinical disease free survival rates for T1 and T2 patients which are similar to surgery.
尽管现代计算机断层扫描已彻底改变了前列腺癌外照射放疗的三维治疗计划,但前列腺尖部常常难以精确界定。一些机构常规使用坐骨结节来确定前列腺癌外照射野的下缘,而其他机构则推荐逆行尿道造影。本研究旨在评估使用坐骨结节底部来确定T1、T2和T3期前列腺癌外照射野下缘的准确性。
通过直接手术暴露前列腺(133例患者)或经直肠超声(20例患者)确定了153例植入患者前列腺尖部的解剖位置。确定前列腺尖部相对于坐骨结节的位置,并绘制在按比例绘制的骨盆骨骼结构示意图上。
所使用的两种方法(手术与超声)在前列腺尖部位置的估计上具有高度一致性。在153例研究患者中,有152例(99.3%)的前列腺尖部位于坐骨结节上方。153例患者中有7例(4.6%)的前列腺尖部距离坐骨结节不到1.5厘米,153例患者中有3例(2%)的尖部 - 结节距离不到1厘米。
本研究表明,将外照射野的下缘定位在坐骨结节处,能充分治疗至少95.4%的所有前列腺患者,且在前列腺尖部下方有1.5厘米或更大的边缘。此外,将下缘定位在坐骨结节处的外照射策略产生了:(a)T1和T2期患者10年临床局部控制率极佳,分别为88%和82%,T3期患者为82%;(b)T1和T2期患者的5年和10年生化(正常前列腺特异性抗原)及临床无病生存率与手术相似。