Heiss M M, Mempel W, Delanoff C, Jauch K W, Gabka C, Mempel M, Dieterich H J, Eissner H J, Schildberg F W
Department of Surgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Sep;12(9):1859-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.9.1859.
Allogeneic blood transfusions have reportedly been associated with a poor prognosis in patients with curatively resected cancer. To control for immunosuppression induced by a speculatively causal allogeneic blood transfusion, we designed a randomized study in which the control group received autologous blood transfusions not related to any condition of immunosuppression.
One hundred twenty patients with potentially curative resectable colorectal cancer and the capability to predeposit autologous blood were randomly selected to receive either standard allogeneic blood transfusion or predeposited autologous blood.
In curatively resected cancer patients, the number who needed allogeneic blood transfusions was reduced from 60% in the allogeneic blood group to 33% in the autologous blood group (P = .009). After a median follow-up duration of 22 months (range, 8 to 48) tumor recurrence was observed in 28.9% of the allogeneic blood group and 16.7% of the autologous blood group. Life-table analysis established a tendency toward a shorter tumor-free survival for the allogeneic blood group (log-rank P = .11). The problem with this analysis was the strong association of allogeneic blood transfusions with tumor recurrence, which interfered in 33% of patients in the autologous blood group who required additional allogeneic blood transfusions. Multivariate analysis of established risk factors for tumor recurrence and surgery-related variables reflecting potential immunosuppressive conditions showed that only pT stage (relative risk, 6.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82 to 23.99; P = .004), pN stage (relative risk, 8.39; 95% CI, 3.15 to 22.33; P < .001), and the need for allogeneic blood (relative risk, 6.18; 95% CI, 2.20 to 17.37; P < .001) were independent predictors of tumor recurrence. Subgroup analysis of patients who received a transfusion of < or = 2 U blood found a significantly higher risk of tumor recurrence in the allogeneic blood group (relative risk, 5.16; 95% CI, 1.13 to 23.62; P = .034), which was reduced to borderline significance (relative risk, 3.54; 95% CI, 0.76 to 16.51; P = .107) by adjustment for tumor (T) and node (N) stage.
As indicated by these first results, the blood transfusion modality has a significant effect on tumor recurrence after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. A change in the practice of blood transfusion might thus potentially surpass the impact of any recent adjuvant treatment strategies.
据报道,同种异体输血与接受根治性切除的癌症患者预后不良有关。为了控制推测性因果关系的同种异体输血诱导的免疫抑制,我们设计了一项随机研究,其中对照组接受与任何免疫抑制状况无关的自体输血。
120例具有潜在根治性可切除的结直肠癌且有能力预存自体血的患者被随机选择接受标准同种异体输血或预存自体血。
在接受根治性切除的癌症患者中,需要同种异体输血的人数从同种异体血组的60%降至自体血组的33%(P = 0.009)。中位随访时间22个月(范围8至48个月)后,同种异体血组28.9%的患者和自体血组16.7%的患者出现肿瘤复发。生存表分析显示同种异体血组无瘤生存期有缩短趋势(对数秩检验P = 0.11)。该分析的问题在于同种异体输血与肿瘤复发密切相关,这干扰了33%需要额外同种异体输血的自体血组患者。对已确定的肿瘤复发危险因素和反映潜在免疫抑制状况的手术相关变量进行多因素分析显示,只有pT分期(相对危险度,6.61;95%置信区间[CI],1.82至23.99;P = 0.004)、pN分期(相对危险度,8.39;95% CI,3.15至22.33;P < 0.001)以及需要同种异体输血(相对危险度,6.18;95% CI,2.20至17.37;P < 0.001)是肿瘤复发的独立预测因素。对输注≤2单位血液的患者进行亚组分析发现,同种异体血组肿瘤复发风险显著更高(相对危险度,5.16;95% CI,1.13至23.62;P = 0.034),通过调整肿瘤(T)和淋巴结(N)分期后降至临界显著水平(相对危险度,3.54;95% CI,0.76至16.51;P = 0.107)。
这些初步结果表明,输血方式对结直肠癌手术治疗后的肿瘤复发有显著影响。因此,输血实践的改变可能潜在地超过任何近期辅助治疗策略的影响。