Arima S, Ito S, Abe K
Department of Clinical Biology and Hormonal Regulation, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 1994 Jun;36(6):692-701.
Preglomerular afferent (Af-) and postglomerular efferent arterioles (Ef-Arts) are crucial vascular segments in the control of glomerular hemodynamics. However, their vascular reactivity is not fully understood. We examined: 1) their responses to angiotensin II (AII) or norepinephrine (NE), and 2) the possible modulatory roles of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins (PGs) in these responses. Rabbit Af- or Ef-Arts were microperfused in vitro. Ef-Arts were perfused in either the orthograde direction from the distal end of Af-Arts through the glomerulus (OP) or the retrograde direction from its distal end to eliminate the influence of the glomerulus (RP). Although AII and NE constricted both arterioles in a dose-dependent manner, sensitivity to AII was higher in Ef-Arts. AII began to cause significant (P < 0.01) constriction from 10(-9) M (11 +/- 3%, n = 11) in Af-Arts, and from 10(-11) M in Ef-Arts (OP; 11 +/- 4%, n = 9. RP; 10 +/- 2%, n = 5). In addition, both AII and NE produced stronger constriction of Ef-Arts in RP than OP; AII at 10(-8) M or NE at 10(-6) M decreased the diameter by 35 +/- 4% or 25 +/- 4% in OP and 74 +/- 4% or 62 +/- 7% in RP. NO synthesis inhibitor nitro-L-arginine (L-NAME; 10(-4) M) increased the sensitivity of Af-Art to AII without affecting the reactivity of Ef-Art; in L-NAME-pretreated Af-Arts, AII began to cause significant constriction from 10(-10) M (14 +/- 4%, n = 9, P < 0.01). Thus, L-NAME-pretreatment significantly decreased the differences in sensitivity to AII between Af- and Ef-Arts without affecting different vascular responses between OP and RP. Indomethacin (5 x 10(-5) M) significantly augmented the AII- or NE-induced Ef-Art constriction only in OP; AII at 10(-8) M or NE at 10(-6) M decreased the diameter by 72 +/- 5% (n = 8) or 48 +/- 3% (n = 7). Thus, indomethacin-pretreatment markedly diminished the differences in responses between OP and RP. These results suggest that 1) NO modulates AII action only in the Af-Art, contributing to the difference in sensitivity to AII between Af- and Ef-Art, and 2) the glomerulus controls vascular reactivity of the downstream Ef-Art by releasing PGs.
肾小球前入球小动脉(Af)和肾小球后出球小动脉(Ef-Arts)是控制肾小球血流动力学的关键血管段。然而,它们的血管反应性尚未完全明确。我们研究了:1)它们对血管紧张素II(AII)或去甲肾上腺素(NE)的反应,以及2)一氧化氮(NO)和前列腺素(PGs)在这些反应中可能的调节作用。兔的Af或Ef-Arts在体外进行微灌注。Ef-Arts以顺行方向从Af-Arts的远端经肾小球进行灌注(OP)或以逆行方向从其远端进行灌注以消除肾小球的影响(RP)。虽然AII和NE均以剂量依赖性方式使两种小动脉收缩,但Ef-Arts对AII的敏感性更高。在Af-Arts中,AII从10^(-9) M开始引起显著(P < 0.01)收缩(11 +/- 3%,n = 11),而在Ef-Arts中从10^(-11) M开始(OP;11 +/- 4%,n = 9。RP;10 +/- 2%,n = 5)。此外,AII和NE在RP中引起的Ef-Arts收缩均强于OP;10^(-8) M的AII或10^(-6) M的NE使OP中的直径分别降低35 +/- 4%或25 +/- 4%,而在RP中分别降低74 +/- 4%或62 +/- 7%。NO合成抑制剂硝基-L-精氨酸(L-NAME;10^(-4) M)增加了Af-Art对AII的敏感性,而不影响Ef-Art的反应性;在L-NAME预处理的Af-Arts中,AII从10^(-10) M开始引起显著收缩(14 +/- 4%,n = 9,P < 0.01)。因此,L-NAME预处理显著降低了Af-和Ef-Arts对AII敏感性的差异,而不影响OP和RP之间不同的血管反应。吲哚美辛(5 x 10^(-5) M)仅在OP中显著增强了AII或NE诱导的Ef-Art收缩;10^(-8) M的AII或10^(-6) M的NE使直径分别降低72 +/- 5%(n = 8)或48 +/- 3%(n = 7)。因此,吲哚美辛预处理显著减小了OP和RP之间反应的差异。这些结果表明:1)NO仅在Af-Art中调节AII的作用,这导致了Af-和Ef-Art对AII敏感性的差异,以及2)肾小球通过释放PGs控制下游Ef-Art的血管反应性。