Dimson C
University of Denver, Colorado.
Psychol Rep. 1994 Jun;74(3 Pt 2):1323-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.3c.1323.
This paper examines some of the ethical issues involved in the treatment of applicants to highly competitive APA-accredited clinical and counseling psychology Ph.D. programs. These issues are analyzed in terms of the 1992 APA Ethics Code as well as the basic ethical principles of nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, fidelity, and autonomy. Issues considered include the applicability of the 1992 APA Ethics Code to the selection process, the obligation to provide applicants accurate and complete information, dual relationships in the selection process, the treatment of rejected or wait-listed applicants, discrimination in the selection process, psychological assessment and research in the selection process, and legal resolutions which pertain to the selection process. In analyzing these issues, the paper calls attention to the need for psychologists functioning as admissions evaluators to be aware of and sensitive to the ethical issues relevant to the selection process.
本文探讨了在高度竞争的美国心理学会(APA)认证的临床与咨询心理学博士项目申请人治疗过程中涉及的一些伦理问题。依据1992年的APA伦理准则以及不伤害、善行、公正、忠诚和自主等基本伦理原则对这些问题进行了分析。所考虑的问题包括1992年APA伦理准则在选拔过程中的适用性、向申请人提供准确完整信息的义务、选拔过程中的双重关系、对被拒绝或列入候补名单的申请人的处理、选拔过程中的歧视、选拔过程中的心理评估与研究以及与选拔过程相关的法律决议。在分析这些问题时,本文提请注意,作为招生评估人员的心理学家需要意识到并敏感对待与选拔过程相关的伦理问题。