Ho K K, Thiessen J J, Bryson S M, Greenberg M L, Einarson T R, Leson C L
Department of Pharmacy, Toronto East General and Orthopaedic Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Ther Drug Monit. 1994 Jun;16(3):238-47. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199406000-00003.
The objectives of this study were: (a) to assess whether treatment outcome with gentamicin in pediatric oncology patients could be improved by a pharmacy based therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service that included pharmacokinetic interpretation; and (b) to describe the challenges in comparing treatment outcome from a prospective to a retrospective study when the merit of gentamicin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was assessed in pediatric oncology patients. Two groups of pediatric oncology patients, aged 1-18 years, received empiric gentamicin therapy for fever and for confirmed or suspected infection, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group 1 consisted of patients from a prospective gentamicin pharmacokinetic study with a formalized pharmacy-based TDM service (n = 52). Group 2 consisted of patients admitted to the oncology units who had gentamicin levels analyzed in the TDM Laboratory without the formalized TDM Service (n = 25). Gentamicin dosage adjustments were recommended based on three blood samples (one pre- and two postdose concentrations) collected between the third and sixth doses from each patient in the TDM group, utilizing pharmacokinetic principles and the Sawchuk-Zaske method. In the non-TDM group, dosage adjustments based on two routine blood samples (one pre- and post-gentamicin dose) were performed by physicians without the help of the formalized TDM Service. Multiple regression analysis showed that time periods (TDM, non-TDM), duration of neutropenia, intravenous methotrexate, and types of cancer, e.g., hematologic malignancy vs. solid tumor, had significant effects on duration of fever. Initial absolute neutrophil count, insertion of central venous line, intravenous cloxacillin administration, bacteriologic cultures, and initial post gentamicin levels > or = 5 mg/ml had no significant effects on the duration of fever. Mean duration of fever in the TDM group (2.8 +/- 2.4 days) was significantly shorter than that in the non-TDM group (9.0 +/- 8.8 days) (p < 0.001). Therapeutic serum concentrations were achieved more promptly in the TDM group, with significantly fewer patients requiring dose changes and fewer sets of serum concentrations required. One patient from each group had a > 100% increase in serum creatinine on day 5 compared to baseline. No apparent nephrotoxicity was observed in other patients. Although there was an association of shorter duration of fever with prompt achievement of therapeutic gentamicin serum concentrations with the TDM Service, there were several unresolved factors that affected duration of fever. A randomized prospective and controlled study would be required to substantiate the merit of TDM in shortening the duration of fever in pediatric oncology patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
(a) 评估在儿科肿瘤患者中,通过包含药代动力学解读的基于药房的治疗药物监测(TDM)服务,是否能改善庆大霉素的治疗效果;(b) 描述在评估儿科肿瘤患者中庆大霉素治疗药物监测(TDM)的价值时,从前瞻性研究到回顾性研究比较治疗效果所面临的挑战。两组年龄在1至18岁的儿科肿瘤患者,因发热以及确诊或疑似感染接受经验性庆大霉素治疗,纳入和排除标准相同。第1组由参与一项前瞻性庆大霉素药代动力学研究且有正式基于药房的TDM服务的患者组成(n = 52)。第2组由入住肿瘤科且在TDM实验室分析了庆大霉素水平但没有正式TDM服务的患者组成(n = 25)。基于TDM组中每位患者在第三剂至第六剂之间采集的三份血样(一份给药前和两份给药后浓度),利用药代动力学原理和索丘克 - 扎斯克方法推荐庆大霉素剂量调整。在非TDM组中,医生在没有正式TDM服务帮助的情况下,根据两份常规血样(一份庆大霉素给药前和给药后)进行剂量调整。多元回归分析表明,时间段(TDM、非TDM)、中性粒细胞减少持续时间、静脉注射甲氨蝶呤以及癌症类型,例如血液系统恶性肿瘤与实体瘤,对发热持续时间有显著影响。初始绝对中性粒细胞计数、中心静脉置管、静脉注射氯唑西林给药、细菌培养以及初始庆大霉素给药后水平≥5mg/ml对发热持续时间无显著影响。TDM组的平均发热持续时间(2.8±2.4天)显著短于非TDM组(9.0±8.8天)(p < 0.001)。TDM组能更迅速地达到治疗性血清浓度,需要调整剂量的患者显著减少,所需血清浓度检测次数也更少。每组各有一名患者在第5天血清肌酐较基线升高>100%。其他患者未观察到明显的肾毒性。尽管TDM服务能迅速达到庆大霉素治疗性血清浓度与发热持续时间缩短有关,但仍有几个未解决的因素影响发热持续时间。需要进行一项随机前瞻性对照研究来证实TDM在缩短儿科肿瘤患者发热持续时间方面的价值。(摘要截断于400字)