• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克利夫兰健康质量选择(CHQC)——一个正在进行的基于社区合作的结果评估项目。

Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC)--an ongoing collaborative, community-based outcomes assessment program.

作者信息

Sirio C A, Angus D C, Rosenthal G E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15260.

出版信息

New Horiz. 1994 Aug;2(3):321-5.

PMID:8087590
Abstract

Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC) is a unique community-based program designed to provide more efficient delivery of healthcare services through routine collection and dissemination of selected patient interventions and outcomes. This effort, coordinated by a consortium of business, hospital, and medical leaders, provides comparative public data on hospital performance. In the ICU, this effort involves collection of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III, as well as severity and prognostic data. To date, results suggest that a higher percentage of patients admitted to the ICU are at low risk of death or adverse outcome when compared with a national benchmark using APACHE III. Risk-adjusted mortality rates are lower and length of stay is shorter than predicted. CHQC demonstrates that cooperative public efforts, undertaken by groups with often divergent interests and using objective risk estimates, can provide useful data for hospital quality improvement activities and market-based health reform efforts.

摘要

克利夫兰健康质量选择(CHQC)是一个独特的基于社区的项目,旨在通过定期收集和传播选定的患者干预措施及结果,更高效地提供医疗服务。这项工作由商业、医院和医学领域的领导者组成的联盟协调,提供有关医院绩效的比较性公共数据。在重症监护病房(ICU),这项工作涉及收集急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)III以及严重程度和预后数据。迄今为止,结果表明,与使用APACHE III的全国基准相比,入住ICU的患者中低死亡风险或不良结局风险的比例更高。风险调整后的死亡率更低,住院时间也比预测的更短。CHQC表明,由利益往往不同的团体开展的合作性公共工作,并使用客观的风险评估,可以为医院质量改进活动和基于市场的医疗改革努力提供有用的数据。

相似文献

1
Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC)--an ongoing collaborative, community-based outcomes assessment program.克利夫兰健康质量选择(CHQC)——一个正在进行的基于社区合作的结果评估项目。
New Horiz. 1994 Aug;2(3):321-5.
2
Designing the Optimal Health Assessment System: the Cleveland Quality Choice (CHQC) example.
Am J Med Qual. 1996 Spring;11(1):S66-9.
3
The use of intensive care unit severity scoring systems in reimbursement strategies.
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):145-56.
4
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's coronary services network: a managed care organization's approach to improving the quality of cardiac care for its members.安盛蓝十字蓝盾公司的冠心病服务网络:一家管理式医疗组织提高其成员心脏护理质量的方法。
Am J Manag Care. 1998 Dec;4(12):1679-86.
5
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.佛蒙特牛津网络:新生儿学基于证据的质量改进。
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9.
6
Objective data and quality assurance programs. Current and future trends.客观数据与质量保证计划。当前及未来趋势。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):157-77.
7
Hospital mortality rate and length of stay in patients admitted at night to the intensive care unit.夜间入住重症监护病房患者的医院死亡率和住院时间。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):858-63. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000055378.31408.26.
8
Cleveland communities collaborate in effort to evaluate hospital efficiency and quality.
QRC Advis. 1995 Apr;11(6):1, 6-7.
9
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
10
Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.1993年至2003年,澳大利亚和新西兰成人重症监护患者双边数据库中的死亡率和住院时间结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):46-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mayo Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk Score is Associated with Medical Resource Utilization During Hospitalization.梅奥心脏重症监护病房入院风险评分与住院期间医疗资源利用相关。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Sep 2;5(5):839-850. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.12.009. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Improving care of the critically ill: institutional and health-care system approaches.改善重症患者的护理:机构和医疗保健系统层面的方法。
Lancet. 2004 Apr 17;363(9417):1314-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16007-8.
3
Is there a July phenomenon? The effect of July admission on intensive care mortality and length of stay in teaching hospitals.
存在“七月现象”吗?七月入院对教学医院重症监护死亡率和住院时间的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):639-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20605.x.